The sulfonylurea controversy: much ado about nothing or cause for concern?

@article{Brady2003TheSC,
  title={The sulfonylurea controversy: much ado about nothing or cause for concern?},
  author={Peter A. Brady and Aleksandar Jovanovi{\'c}},
  journal={Journal of the American College of Cardiology},
  year={2003},
  volume={42 6},
  pages={
          1022-5
        }
}
The dictum “Primum non nocere” remains axiomatic of modern clinical practice, yet adverse drug reactions are accepted as a consequence of drug use despite estimates that morbidity and mortality resulting from adverse reactions to drugs is not insignificant [(1)][1]. At the bedside, an accurate 

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 CITATIONS

Protective effect of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide 4 on kidneys in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

  • Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology
  • 2009
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND

Sex-specific and exercise-acquired cardioprotection is abolished by sarcolemmal KATP channel blockade in the rat heart.

  • American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology
  • 2007
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES BACKGROUND