The splendid isolation of biological nomenclature
@article{Laurin2008TheSI, title={The splendid isolation of biological nomenclature}, author={M. Laurin}, journal={Zoologica Scripta}, year={2008}, volume={37} }
Recent arguments against phylogenetic nomenclature (PN) rest on the assumption that, generally, consensus about the meaning of taxon names arises spontaneously. A brief historical review shows that this is not the case. Comparisons with other fields as diverse as physics, geology and geopolitics show that precision in the meaning of terms is essential to produce consensus, which is precisely the opposite as the avowed aims of rank‐based nomenclature (RN). The difficulty in reaching consensus… CONTINUE READING
Topics from this paper
34 Citations
The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late
- Biology
- 2011
- 36
- PDF
The subjective nature of Linnaean categories and its impact in evolutionary biology and biodiversity studies
- Biology
- 2010
- 34
- Highly Influenced
- PDF
Three centuries of paradigm changes in biological classification: Is the end in sight?
- Biology
- 2009
- 32
- PDF
Recent progress in paleontological methods for dating the Tree of Life
- Biology, Medicine
- Front. Gene.
- 2012
- 22
- Highly Influenced
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?
- Biology, Medicine
- Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- 2002
- 68
The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature.
- Biology, Medicine
- Systematic biology
- 2006
- 52
- PDF
Are the linnean and phylogenetic nomenclatural systems combinable? Recommendations for biological nomenclature.
- Biology, Medicine
- Systematic biology
- 2006
- 33
- Highly Influential
- PDF