The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing?

@article{Street2015TheSO,
  title={The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing?},
  author={Chris N. H. Street and Jaume Masip},
  journal={Scandinavian journal of psychology},
  year={2015},
  volume={56 3},
  pages={
          254-63
        }
}
People believe others are telling the truth more often than they actually are; this is called the truth bias. Surprisingly, when a speaker is judged at multiple points across their statement the truth bias declines. Previous claims argue this is evidence of a shift from (biased) heuristic processing to (reasoned) analytical processing. In four experiments we contrast the heuristic-analytic model (HAM) with alternative accounts. In Experiment 1, the decrease in truth responding was not the… 

Tables from this paper

The power of the truth bias: False information affects memory and judgment even in the absence of distraction

Truth-bias is the tendency to believe information whether or not it is true. According to a prominent account, this tendency results from limited cognitive resources. We presented participants true

Lies, Damn Lies, and Expectations: How Base Rates Inform Lie-Truth Judgments

We are biased towards thinking that people are telling the truth. Our study represents the first test of how beliefs about the base rate of truths and lies affect this truth bias. Raters were told

The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.

In 2 experiments, it is shown that the judgment is the result of attending to a single behavior, as indirect raters are instructed to do, and does not access implicit knowledge, but simply focuses the perceiver on more useful cues.

Is justice blind or myopic?: An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

Previous studies have shown that people are truth-biased in that they tend to believe the information they receive, even if it is clearly flagged as false. The truth bias has been recently proposed

A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions

Results suggest that certain cognitively demanding interviews may be less useful when interviewing to detect false intentions, and that explaining a true intention while under higher cognitive demand places truth tellers at risk of being misclassified.

ALIED: Humans as adaptive lie detectors

Power and lie detection

Social power undermines focus on others and increases reliance on stereotype-consistent information. Thus, power may enhance focus on stereotypical cues to deception, thereby decreasing lie detection

Opinions, actions and emotions: does the content of lies affect their detectability?

ABSTRACT People principally deceive others about opinions, actions and emotions. In two Experiments, this study examined the ability to detect these three types of lies. In Experiment 1, participants

Experienced and novice officers' generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments.

Unlike experienced officers, who have embraced the police culture to a greater degree, novice officers are not dispositionally suspicious (generalized communicative suspicion); however, they are able to mirror the prototypical police behavior in police-related contexts.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES

Heuristic versus Systematic Processing of Information in Detecting Deception: Questioning the Truth Bias

An experiment was conducted in which participants who were taking a psychology and law course were requested to make judgments of credibility at different points of the senders' statements, suggesting that when exposed to brief communications, the observers make heuristic judgments.

Regression toward the Mean or Heuristic Processing in Detecting Deception?: Reply to Elaad (2010)

It is argued that because Masip, et al. took multiple Moment 1 judgments over time and then averaged across judgments, regression toward the mean was extremely unlikely and the decrease in truth judgments was found under several separate conditions; this cannot be explained by random fluctuations alone.

Accuracy of Deception Judgments

  • C. F. BondB. Depaulo
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2006
It is proposed that people judge others' deceptions more harshly than their own and that this double standard in evaluating deceit can explain much of the accumulated literature.

Truth Biases and Aroused Suspicion in Relational Deception

Relatively stable perceptions of truthfulness tend to develop in relationships, although situations may arise causing partners to become suspicious of one another. The truth bias that grows as

Observers' decision moment in deception detection experiments: Its impact on judgment, accuracy, and confidence

Research into the nonverbal detection of deception has typically been conducted by asking observers to judge whether a number of videotaped statements are truthful or deceptive. In most cases, the

Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.

The program of research now known as the heuristics and biases approach began with a survey of 84 participants at the 1969 meetings of the Mathematical Psychology Society and the American

Effects of preconceptions on deception detection and new answers to why lie-catchers often fail

Abstract This study investigated the extent to which crediting and discrediting background information, given to observers before they watched three video-taped interviews with the same witness,

Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect”

Deception research has consistently shown that accuracy rates tend to be just over fifty percent when accuracy rates are averaged across truthful and deceptive messages and when an equal number of

Cognitive Biases and Nonverbal Cue Availability in Detecting Deception

In potentially deceptive situations, people rely on mental shortcuts to help process information. These heuristic judgments are often biased and result in inaccurate assessments of sender veracity.