• DOI:10.1098/RSTB.1996.0125
• Corpus ID: 1841280

The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.

@article{Damasio1996TheSM,
  title={The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.},
  author={Antonio R. Damasio},
  journal={Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences},
  year={1996},
  volume={351 1346},
  pages={
          1413-20
        }
}

• A. Damasio
• Published 29 October 1996
• Psychology, Biology
• Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences

In this article I discuss a hypothesis, known as the somatic marker hypothesis, which I believe is relevant to the understanding of processes of human reasoning and decision making. The ventromedial sector of the prefrontal cortices is critical to the operations postulated here, but the hypothesis does not necessarily apply to prefrontal cortex as a whole and should not be seen as an attempt to unify frontal lobe functions under a single mechanism. The key idea in the hypothesis is that 'marker' signals influence the processes of response to stimuli, at multiple levels of operation, some of which occur overtly (consciously, 'in mind') and some of which occur covertly (non-consciously, in a non-minded manner). The marker signals arise in bioregulatory processes, including those which express themselves in emotions and feelings, but are not necessarily confined to those alone. This is the reason why the markers are termed somatic: they relate to body-state structure and regulation even when they do not arise in the body proper but rather in the brain's representation of the body. Examples of the covert action of 'marker' signals are the undeliberated inhibition of a response learned previously; the introduction of a bias in the selection of an aversive or appetitive mode of behaviour, or in the otherwise deliberate evaluation of varied option-outcome scenarios. Examples of overt action include the conscious 'qualifying' of certain option-outcome scenarios as dangerous or advantageous. The hypothesis rejects attempts to limit human reasoning and decision making to mechanisms relying, in an exclusive and unrelated manner, on either conditioning alone or cognition alone.