The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles

@article{Bonnefon2016TheSD,
  title={The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles},
  author={Jean‐François Bonnefon and Azim F. Shariff and Iyad Rahwan},
  journal={Science},
  year={2016},
  volume={352},
  pages={1573 - 1576}
}
Codes of conduct in autonomous vehicles When it becomes possible to program decision-making based on moral principles into machines, will self-interest or the public good predominate? In a series of surveys, Bonnefon et al. found that even though participants approve of autonomous vehicles that might sacrifice passengers to save others, respondents would prefer not to ride in such vehicles (see the Perspective by Greene). Respondents would also not approve regulations mandating self-sacrifice… 
How Should Autonomous Vehicles Redistribute the Risks of the Road?
If this expectation materializes, there are strong reasons to favor replacing human-driven vehicles with autonomous ones. The advent of autonomous vehicles, however, likely will be gradual, with the
Reply to: Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles
TLDR
The results challenge the idea that people want autonomous vehicles to treat different human lives unequally, revealing that this apparent preference for inequality is driven by the specific ‘trolley-type’ paradigm used by the Moral Machine experiment.
Hurting Others vs. Hurting Myself, a Dilemma for our Autonomous Vehicle
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) will soon be a reality on our roads. Up to now, their standard behaviour is predetermined since it is the result of programmed algorithms. Under risky traffic situations,
Autonomous Vehicles Require Socio-Political Acceptance—An Empirical and Philosophical Perspective on the Problem of Moral Decision Making
TLDR
What factors people recognize as relevant in driving situations are investigated and subjects showed a surprisingly high willingness to sacrifice themselves to save others, took the age of potential victims in a crash into consideration and were willing to swerve onto a sidewalk if this saved more lives.
Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles
TLDR
The results challenge the idea that people want autonomous vehicles to treat different human lives unequally, revealing that this apparent preference for inequality is driven by the specific ‘trolley-type’ paradigm used by the Moral Machine experiment.
Our driverless dilemma
TLDR
It is shown that people generally approve of cars programmed to minimize the total amount of harm, even at the expense of their passengers, but are not enthusiastic about riding in such “utilitarian” cars—that is, autonomous vehicles that are, in certain emergency situations, programmed to sacrifice their passengers for the greater good.
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project
TLDR
The Ethical Valence Theory is proposed, which paints AV decision-making as a type of claim mitigation: different road users hold different moral claims on the vehicle’s behavior, and the vehicle must mitigate these claims as it makes decisions about its environment.
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles
TLDR
It will be argued for an obligatory ethics setting implemented in ADVs after a set of experiments in which participants experienced modified trolley dilemmas as drivers in virtual reality environments showed that participants, in general, decided in a utilitarian manner.
Risk of Injury in Moral Dilemmas With Autonomous Vehicles
TLDR
Experimental work is presented that systematically studies the effect of risk of injury on the decisions people make in moral dilemmas and finds significant evidence of utilitarianism.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong
Computers are already approving financial transactions, controlling electrical supplies, and driving trains. Soon, service robots will be taking care of the elderly in their homes, and military
Products Liability and Driverless Cars: Issues and Guiding Principles for Legislation
Executive Summary As driverless cars—or more formally, autonomous vehicles—continue to attract growing interest and investment, the associated liability issues are also getting increased attention.
Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge
TLDR
This dissertation aims to provide a history of web exceptionalism from 1989 to 2002, a period chosen in order to explore its roots as well as specific cases up to and including the year in which descriptions of “Web 2.0” began to circulate.
Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore
TLDR
Using actual transportation data, this analysis suggests a shared-vehicle mobility solution can meet the personal mobility needs of the entire population with a fleet whose size is approximately 1/3 of the total number of passenger vehicles currently in operation.
For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment.
TLDR
The association between social class and utilitarian judgment was reduced in a condition in which empathy was induced, but not in a control condition, suggesting that reduced empathy helps account for the utilitarianism of upper-class individuals.
The Social Dilemmas
"For that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Every one thinks chiefly of his own, hardly at all of the common interest; and only when he is himself concerned
Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence
INTRODUCTIONThe idea that humans could, at some point, develop machines that actually "think" for themselves and act autonomously has been embedded in our literature and culture since the beginning
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
TLDR
It is shown that people who make characteristically deontological judgments are preferred as social partners, perceived as more moral and trustworthy, and are trusted more in economic games, providing empirical support for a partner choice account of moral intuitions.
Junior: The Stanford entry in the Urban Challenge
TLDR
The architecture of Junior is presented, a robotic vehicle capable of navigating urban environments autonomously and able to select its own routes, perceive and interact with other traffic, and execute various urban driving skills including lane changes, U‐turns, parking and merging into moving traffic.
Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems
Trolley problems have been used in the development of moral theory and the psychological study of moral judgments and behavior. Most of this research has focused on people from the West, with
...
...