The seven sins of pseudo-science

  title={The seven sins of pseudo-science},
  author={Anthony A. Derksen},
  journal={Journal for General Philosophy of Science},
  • A. A. Derksen
  • Published 1993
  • Philosophy
  • Journal for General Philosophy of Science
SummaryIn this paper I will argue that a profile of the pseudo-sciences can be gained from the scientific pretensions of the pseudo-scientist. These pretensions provide two yardsticks which together take care of the charge of scientific prejudice that any suggested demarcation of pseudo-science has to face. To demonstrate that my analysis has teeth I will apply it to Freud and modern-day Bach-kabbalists. Against Laudan I will argue that the problem of demarcation is not a pseudo-problem, though… Expand
The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: a look into Freud's rhetorical tool box
In my ‘Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science’ (Journal for General Philosophy of Science 1993) I argued against Grünbaum that Freud commits all Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science. Yet how does Freud manage to foolExpand
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation
A definition of pseudoscience is proposed, according to which a statement is pseudoscientific if and only if it (1) pertains to an issue within the domains of science, (2) is not epistemicallyExpand
Feng Shui as Pseudoscience
Given the extent of feng shui belief, and the personal, social, cultural, and economic impact that it has, everyone can benefit from judging its scientificity. Efforts to distinguish science fromExpand
The epistemic predicament of a pseudoscience: Social constructivism confronts Freudian psychoanalysis
It is argued that Freudian psychoanalysis provides a perfect illustration of what SC claims is actually going on in science, by illustrating what science would look like if it were to function as SC claims it does. Expand
Science, epistemology, and future prospects for psychoanalysis
The question of whether or not psychoanalysis can be considered scientific has been the subject of considerable debate. While Popper classified psychoanalysis as prescientific (e.g., 1963), GrünbaumExpand
The Demarcation between Philosophy and Science
This paper is based on a criterion recently proposed by Richard Fumerton for demarcating philosophy of mind and cognitive science. I suggest to extend it to a demarcation criterion between philosophyExpand
Does the Tally Argument Make Freud a Sophisticated Methodologist?
In his The Foundations of Psychoanalysis (1984) Grunbaum compliments Freud on the development of the Tally Argument as an answer to a number of serious methodological criticisms, "The epistemologicalExpand
Demarcating Science from Non-Science
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the demarcation of science from non-science. If a discipline were unable to offer a characterization of its subject matter, it is suspected that itsExpand
Putting Sociology First—Reconsidering the Role of the Social in ‘Nature of Science’ Education
Contrasting two examples from 2005, a creationism-trial and a recent textbook, the article shows two different ways of employing social considerations to demarcate science from non-science. DrawingExpand
The Demarcation of Parapsychology: History, Controversies and Future Prospects
Parapsychology has not only a long history, but also its enthusiastic proponents and detractors within the scientific community. With the professionalization of parapsychology in 1927, criticism ofExpand


Does the Tally Argument Make Freud a Sophisticated Methodologist?
In his The Foundations of Psychoanalysis (1984) Grunbaum compliments Freud on the development of the Tally Argument as an answer to a number of serious methodological criticisms, "The epistemologicalExpand
Bunkum, Flim-Flam and Quackery: Pseudoscience as a Philosophical Problem
Summary In the first half of the paper, it is argued that while the prospects for a criterion for demarcating scientific theories from pseudoscientific ones are exceedingly dim, it is a mistake toExpand
The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique
This study is a philosophical critique of the foundations of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis. As such, it also takes cognizance of his claim that psychoanalysis has the credentials of a naturalExpand
The Scientific Status of Psychoanalysis
Publisher Summary Every young science goes through a number of stages in its development from naturalistic observation—through the detection of areas of lawfulness and the construction of moreExpand
The Demise of the Demarcation Problem
We live in a society which sets great store by science. Scientific ‘experts’ play a privileged role in many of our institutions, ranging from the courts of law to the corridors of power. At a moreExpand
The Theory of Your Dreams
The Interpretation of Dreams is often thought to be Freud’s best book-length work. It was, indeed, Freud’s first lengthy statement of a substantially original psychological theory. Freud wrote theExpand
Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability
Karl Popper says psychoanalysis is a pseudo-science others deny this. What is Popper’s conception of pseudo-science and why docs he hold Freud’s psychoanalysis to be an example of one? What would itExpand
Computational Philosophy of Science
By applying research in artificial intelligence to problems in the philosophy of science, Paul Thagard develops an exciting new approach to the study of scientific reasoning. He uses computationalExpand
An Autobiographical Study
Freud approved the overall editorial plan, specific renderings of key words and phrases, and the addition of valuable notes, from bibliographical and explanatory. Many of the translations were doneExpand
Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy
(a) GERMAN EDITIONS: 1909 Jb. psychoanal. psychopath. Forsch., 1 (1), 1-109. 1913 S.K.S.N., III, 1-122 (1921, 2nd. ed.). 1924 G.S., 8, 129-263. 1932 Vier Krankengeschichten, 142-281. 1941 G.W., 7,Expand