The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals

@article{Loughnan2010TheRO,
  title={The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals},
  author={Steve Loughnan and Nick Haslam and Brock Bastian},
  journal={Appetite},
  year={2010},
  volume={55},
  pages={156-159}
}
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
TLDR
The role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments is highlighted, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial and reduces negative affect associated with dissonance.
The Psychology of Eating Animals
Most people both eat animals and care about animals. Research has begun to examine the psychological processes that allow people to negotiate this “meat paradox.” To understand the psychology of
The Psychology of Meat Consumption
TLDR
This chapter starts with a brief outline of the historic development of the interspecies relationships and discusses the role of norms in changing behavior, and possible ways of employing community-based social marketing are offered.
The ‘me’ in meat: Does affirming the self make eating animals seem more morally wrong?
“But I Don’t Eat that Much Meat”
As arguments become more pronounced that meat consumption harms the environment, public health, and nonhuman animals, meat-eaters should experience increased pressure to justify their behavior. The
Harnessing Moral Psychology to Reduce Meat Consumption
How can we make moral progress on factory farming? Part of the answer lies in human moral psychology. Meat consumption remains high, despite increased awareness of its negative impact on animal
Motivated Moral Outrage Among Meat-Eaters
Many meat-eaters experience cognitive dissonance when aware that their eating behaviors contradict their moral values, such as desires to protect the environment or animals from harm. One way in
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into
Ambivalence towards meat
Risks of meat: the relative impact of cognitive, affective and moral concerns
Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history
Values and Beliefs of Vegetarians and Omnivores
TLDR
Compared with the full range of vegetarians and omnivores on right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, human values, and consumption values, the finding suggests that individuals consume meat and embrace its symbolism in ways consistent with their self-definitions.
Animals and the Scope of Justice
Animals share our physical world, but the moral rules, values, and concerns about fairness that apply to those within our scope of justice rarely apply to animals. This paper reports an experiment
Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: an examination of the role of ambivalence
TLDR
Regression analyses showed that, as predicted by the Theory of Planned Behaviour, attitudes, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of intention to follow each diet (apart from the vegetarian diet, where subjective norm was non-significant).
Teenage Vegetarianism: Prevalence, Social and Cognitive Contexts
TLDR
The findings show that teenage vegetarianism is primarily a female phenomenon, ranging in prevalence, according to definition, from 8 to 37% of women and 1 to 12% of men.
Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts
...
...