The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them

@article{Davies2011TheRO,
  title={The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them},
  author={H. E. Davies and Christopher G Wathen and Fergus V Gleeson},
  journal={BMJ : British Medical Journal},
  year={2011},
  volume={342}
}
#### Summary points Since the 1970s, when computed tomography was introduced into clinical practice, the array of imaging tests that expose patients to radiation has vastly increased. This is a result of improved computed tomography techniques, advances in other techniques such as digital subtraction angiography, and the development of modalities such as positron emission tomography coregistered with computed tomography and single photon emission tomography coregistered with computed… 

A systematic review of radiation dose associated with different generations of multidetector CT coronary angiography

This analysis has shown that dose‐saving strategies can substantially reduce the radiation dose in CT coronary angiography, and indicates an increased awareness of risks associated with high radiation doses among them.

Re: Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging: A Wake-up Call for Oman!

  • V. Gowri
  • Medicine
    Sultan Qaboos University medical journal
  • 2011
A wake-up call is necessary not only for Oman, but also for the rest of the world, as the risks of radiation exposure are underestimated by both patients and physicians.

Radiation dose estimation in computed tomography examinations using NRPB-SR250 software in aretrospective analysis of a patient population.

The NRPB-SR250 software proved to be a robust tool for the assessment of organ doses and the effective radiation dose from CT, while challenges were encountered in finding the precise imaging data in retrospective protocols.

Whole-body MRI in pediatric patients with cancer

The use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for the screening, diagnosis, staging, response assessment, and post-therapeutic follow-up of children with solid sporadic tumours or those with related genetic syndromes is presented.

Efficacy of high-pitch CT protocols for radiation dose reduction

Evaluating the efficacy of high pitch in representative CT protocols examining lung embolism found it to be less effective for tissues at the margin of the scanned area and the dose reduction potential of the  +F mode greatly depends on the position of the organ in the scan field.

Low-dose multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Substantial reductions of radiation dose are achievable at multidetector CT angiography of the peripheral arteries without compromising image quality and diagnostic performance if acquisition protocols are modified appropriately and used in conjunction with a contrast material containing a high concentration of iodine.

International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study

CT protocols and radiation doses vary greatly across countries and are primarily attributable to local choices regarding technical parameters, rather than patient, institution, or machine characteristics, suggesting that the optimization of doses to a consistent standard should be possible.

Radiation risk from CT: implications for cancer screening.

  • J. M. Albert
  • Medicine
    AJR. American journal of roentgenology
  • 2013
The available data suggest a small but real risk of radiation-induced malignancy from CT that could become significant at the population level with widespread use of CT-based screening, but a growing body of literature suggests that the benefits of CT screening for lung cancer in high-risk patients and CT colonography for colorectal cancer may significantly outweigh the radiation risk.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES

Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

Radiation doses from commonly performed diagnostic CT examinations are higher and more variable than generally quoted, highlighting the need for greater standardization across institutions.

CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

In most large hospitals in the United States CT scanning probably accounts for more than 10% of diagnostic radiology examinations and about two-thirds of the radiation dose, and most patients have multiple scan sequences.

Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.

Effective dose provides an approximate indicator of potential detriment from ionizing radiation and should be used as one parameter in evaluating the appropriateness of examinations involving ionizing Radiation.

Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Concerns arise when CT examinations are used without a proven clinical rationale, when alternative modalities could be used with equal efficacy, or when CT scans are repeated unnecessarily.

Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.

American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

The facts are summarized about CT scans, which involve much higher doses of radiation than plain films, and the implications for public health are summarized.

Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT.

The average fetal radiation dose with helical CT is less than that with ventilation-perfusion lung scanning during all trimesters.

Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism.

In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, multidetector CTA-CTV has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than does CTA alone, with similar specificity, and additional testing is necessary when the clinical probability is inconsistent with the imaging results.