The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings

@article{Thelwall2019TheRS,
  title={The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings},
  author={Mike A Thelwall},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2019},
  volume={abs/1903.04427}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

How common are explicit research questions in journal articles?

Assessment of the extent to which research questions are explicitly mentioned in 17 out of 22 areas of scholarship from 2000 to 2018 by searching over a million full-text open access journal articles finds the use of explicitly labeled research questions or other explicit research purpose terminology is nonstandard in most or all broad fields.

An analysis of form and function of a research article between and within publishers and journals

An article heading form and function analysis across 12 publishers including both research articles and nonresearch articles indicated wide variability in the organization of research articles with 24 common sections, known by 186 different names both within and across publishing houses.

The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts

This research developed a new classification scheme for rhetorical moves in data paper abstracts by expanding a well‐received system that focuses on English‐language research article abstracts and used this expanded scheme to classify and analyze rhetorical moves used in two flagship data journals.

Writing for Impact in Service Research

For service researchers, contributing to academic advancement through academic publications is a raison d’être. Moreover, demand is increasing for service researchers to make a difference beyond

Relationships between method-section citation rates and citation contexts: evidence from highly cited references in psychology

  • K. Li
  • Psychology
    Online Inf. Rev.
  • 2022
PurposeThe Method section of research articles offers an important space for researchers to describe their research processes and research objects they utilize. To understand the relationship between

The Scientific Abstract as a Discursive Genre in Peruvian Scientific Journals of Education

The aim of the present study is to analyze the structure of 117 abstracts extracted from four Peruvian scientific journals of education. The analysis of the study units was carried out following the

The reinstrumentalization of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis

  • Kai Li
  • Psychology
    Quantitative Science Studies
  • 2021
This paper quantitatively examines the citation contexts of an exemplary research instrument, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in full-text psychological publications and finds that a new version of the DSM is increasingly regarded as a valid instrument after its publication.

The reinstrumentalization of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis

Research instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies.

The reinstrumentalization of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis

Research instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies.

The reinstrumentalization of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis

Research instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles

Summarizing Scientific Articles: Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status

This article provides a gold standard for summaries of this kind consisting of a substantial corpus of conference articles in computational linguistics annotated with human judgments of the rhetorical status and relevance of each sentence in the articles.

Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge?

Direct citation provides a more accurate representation of the taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge than either bibliographic coupling or co‐citation, and it is found that discipline‐level taxonomies based on journal schema are highly inaccurate compared to topic‐levelTaxonomies, and recommend against their use.

Argumentative zoning information extraction from scientific text

It is demonstrated that this type of text analysis can be used for generating usertailored and task-tailored summaries and for performing more informative citation analyses, and the application of a robust discourse and argumentation analysis can make text understanding techniques for practical document management more robust.

Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings

This book is a clear, authoritative guide to the analysis of genre, which relates work in sociolinguistics, text linguistics and discourse analysis to the study of specialist areas of language.

Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update.

  • J. Hartley
  • Geology
    Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
  • 2014
Comment on developments in the research since that time and the use of structured abstracts over the last ten years and the phrase “structured abstracts” has now become commonplace, and there is now no real need to define what is meant by the term.

Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science

It is argued that the “intellectual distance” between the knowledge embodied in research proposals and an evaluator’s own expertise systematically relates to the evaluations given.