The reward and risk of social media for academics

@article{Britton2019TheRA,
  title={The reward and risk of social media for academics},
  author={B Britton and Chris J. Jackson and Jessica Wade},
  journal={Nature Reviews Chemistry},
  year={2019},
  pages={1-3}
}
We are three academics who are active on social media. We explore the motivations for and benefits of engaging with social media, as well as its costs and risks. Overall, we believe this engagement to be a net benefit for us, our employers and for wider society.Three academics who are active on social media explore the motivations for and benefits of engaging with social media, as well as its costs and risks. Overall, they conclude there is a net benefit for themselves, their employers and… 

Driving enrolment intention through social media engagement: a study of Vietnamese prospective students

ABSTRACT Social media platforms provide prospective international students with ready access and exposure to information relevant to international higher education institutions and their respective

Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist

Ten simple rules to help researchers who are planning to start their journey on Twitter to take their first steps and advance their careers using Twitter.

What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on Twitter

This work curated a collection of 46 clear and engaging tweetorials from multiple domains and analyzed them for the writing techniques that they employ, and found that while tweetedorials use many traditional science writing techniques, they also use more subjective language, actively build credibility, and incorporate media in unique ways.

In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility

ABSTRACT Much of what we know we know through testimony, and knowing on the basis of testimony requires some degree of trust in speakers. Trust is therefore very valuable. But in trusting, we expose

Rapid collaborative knowledge building via Twitter after significant geohazard events

Abstract. Twitter is an established social media platform valued by scholars as an open way to disseminate scientific information and to publicly discuss research results. Scientific discussions on

Ten Simple Rules to becoming a principal investigator

The aim of this article is to identify some of the broader skills (rules 1–4) and behaviors (rules 5–10) that can help with getting a PI position, meant as advice not instruction.

Hostile climates are barriers to diversifying the geosciences

Abstract. The geosciences are one of the least diverse disciplines in the United States, despite the field's relevance to livelihoods and local and global economies. Bias, discrimination, and

An advanced pluripotent stem cell test for developmental toxicity

A meta-analysis of 122 studies on the development and use ofindaGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS for EARLY ALZHEIMER’s DISEASE and other DEMENTIA TYPES found that 122 studies out of 122 had at least one study recommendation of “inadequate”.

Note de recherche

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists

  • N. Hall
  • Computer Science
    Genome Biology
  • 2014
The ‘Kardashian Index’ is proposed, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers.

Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops?

There have been strong calls for scientists to share their discoveries with society. Some scientists have heeded these calls through social media platforms such as Twitter. Here, we ask whether

A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter

This work provides new methods for disambiguating and identifying particular actors on social media and describing the behaviors of scientists, thus providing foundational information for the construction and use of indicators on the basis of social media metrics.

Social-Media-Guidelines

Dieses Kapitel befasst sich mit den unterschiedlichen Formen von Social-Media-Vorgaben im Unternehmen. Es wird beschrieben, warum es sinnvoll ist, unterschiedliche Arten von Vorgaben fur die

“We muddle our way through”: shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research

The use and availability of digital media is changing researchers' roles and simultaneously providing a route for a more engaging relationship with stakeholders throughout the research process.

Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists

It is found that scientists posting self-portraits to Instagram from the science lab/field were perceived as significantly warmer and more trustworthy, and no less competent, than scientists posting photos of only their work.

Request a woman scientist: A database for diversifying the public face of science

The database “Request a Woman Scientist” comprised over 7,500 women from 174 scientific disciplines and 133 countries, built upon a voluntary questionnaire regarding career stage, degree, scientific discipline, geographic location, and other self-identifying dimensions of representation.

Moral outrage in the digital age

This research examines how new technologies change the expression of moral outrage and its social consequences on digital media and online social networks.

Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

It can be concluded that the choice of the database affects widely-used citation and evaluation metrics but that bibliometric transfer functions exist to relate the metrics from these three databases.