• DOI:10.1007/BF00317701
• Corpus ID: 25556587

The relationships between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra

@article{BenShahar2004TheRB,
  title={The relationships between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra},
  author={Raphael Ben-Shahar and Malcolm James Coe},
  journal={Oecologia},
  year={2004},
  volume={90},
  pages={422-428}
}

• R. Ben-Shahar, M. Coe
• Published 1 June 1992
• Biology, Medicine
• Oecologia

SummaryWe examined the relationships between soil factors, nutrients in grasses and foraging behaviour of wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and zebra (Equus burchelli) in a semi-arid nature reserve in South Africa. We tested the hypotheses that: (1) Soil nutrient levels determine the abundance and distribution of grass species; (2) nutrient levels within grass species are correlated with soil nutrient levels; (3) the spatial distribution and diet composition of ungulates is influenced by the nutrient availability in grasses. The distribution of soil factors in upper ground levels did explain the differential abundance of grass species in the reserve. Ordination of nutrient levels in grass species showed high levels of particular nutrients in certain species, but no one species showed uniformly high levels of all nutrients. Moreover, grasses on fertile soils did not necessarily accumulate higher nutrient levels than grasses on poor soils. Thus, nutrient levels in grasses were not correlated with soil nutrient levels. Wildebeest and zebra responded to monthly variations in the levels of N and P in grasses by moving seasonally to habitat types characterized by grass communities containing a high proportion of nutritional species, rather than by selecting particularly nutritious species within communities. We suggest that within semiarid savannas, areas with a higher diversity of grass communities will be more likely to have some of these communities containing high nutrient levels at any given season, than a lower diversity area. Therefore, the higher-diversity area would be likely to support more herbivores, and thus diversity would control carrying capacity.