The redundant-signals paradigm and preattentive visual processing.

@article{Zehetleitner2008TheRP,
  title={The redundant-signals paradigm and preattentive visual processing.},
  author={Michael Zehetleitner and Hermann Josef Muller and Joseph Krummenacher},
  journal={Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library},
  year={2008},
  volume={13},
  pages={
          5279-93
        }
}
Physiological and cognitive models of vision agree that the pre-attentive processing of visual stimuli is organized in a parallel and segregated fashion. However, several incompatible models have been proposed for the subsequent processing stages. They differ in their assumptions about architecture (serial, parallel, or coactive/integrative), stopping-rules (self-terminating, or exhaustive), spatial specificity of saliency signal coding (signal pooling across locations, or spatially distinct… 
Visual Saliency Computations: Mechanisms, Constraints, and the Effect of Feedback
TLDR
It is found that saliency signals are rapidly generated through lateral excitation and inhibition in successive layers of neural populations selective to a single feature, and these signals can be improved by feedback from a higher cortical area that represents a saliency map.
Salience-based integration of redundant signals in visual pop-out search: evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
TLDR
The findings suggest that target signal integration in singleton search paradigms occurs pre-attentively, that is, prior to focal-attentional target selection, with observers basing their responses on the detection of featureless saliency signals, even under conditions in which the target features remain constant and are known in advance.
Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing.
TLDR
It is argued that saliency computations may be biased, in a spatially parallel manner, by top-down signals reflecting expectations of particular stimulus attributes.
Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: Separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects
Feature singleton search is faster when the target-defining dimension is repeated, rather than changed, across trials (Found & Müller, 1996). A similar dimension repetition benefit has been observed
Perceptual Basis of Redundancy Gains in Visual Pop-out Search
TLDR
The present study combined mental chronometry with electrophysiological markers that reflect purely preattentive perceptual plus response selection-related (stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential [LRP]), or purely response production-related processes (response-locked LRP).
Visually guided pointing movements are driven by the salience map.
TLDR
Modulations of salience influence yes/no target detection or left/right localization responses in manual key-press search tasks, as well as ocular or skeletal movements to the target, which supports the notion of a motor-unspecific salience map, which guides covert attention aswell as overt eye and hand movements.
The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures
TLDR
This result supports saliency summation (coactivation) models of search for singleton feature targets, and excludes serial-exhaustive and interactive race models as possible explanations for RMI violations.
Is one enough? The case for non-additive influences of visual features on crossmodal Stroop interference
TLDR
Overall, reaction times were faster for visual targets and were dominated by behavioral facilitation for the cross-modal interactions, but showed surprisingly little influence of visual feature redundancy.
Salience from the decision perspective: You know where it is before you know it is there.
TLDR
A model of detection and localization tasks based on random walk processes is proposed, which can account for the present findings and is at variance with two classes of standard models of visual search and object recognition.
Texture segmentation: Do the processing units on the saliency map increase with eccentricity?
TLDR
It is proposed that the saliency map is structured into processing units whose size is increasing with retinal eccentricity, and also the strength of a saliency signal can determine the spatial area of its impairing influence.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 79 REFERENCES
Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.
TLDR
This study addresses the question of how simple networks of neuron-like elements can account for a variety of phenomena associated with this shift of selective visual attention and suggests a possible role for the extensive back-projection from the visual cortex to the LGN.
A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention
TLDR
A detailed computer implementation of a saliency map scheme is described, focusing on the problem of combining information across modalities, here orientation, intensity and color information, in a purely stimulus-driven manner, which is applied to common psychophysical stimuli as well as to a very demanding visual search task.
Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.
  • L. Chan, W. Hayward
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 2009
TLDR
Measurement of dimension-specific performance during detection and localization, tasks that require operation of dimensional modules and the master map, respectively, showed a dissociation between tasks in terms of both dimension-switching costs and cross-dimension attentional capture, supporting FIT's postulation that different mechanisms are involved in parallel and focal attention searches.
Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective?
In visual search for singleton feature targets, detection RTs are faster when the target-defining dimension is constant across trials rather than variable; in the latter case, RTs are faster when the
A feature-integration theory of attention
TLDR
A new hypothesis about the role of focused attention is proposed, which offers a new set of criteria for distinguishing separable from integral features and a new rationale for predicting which tasks will show attention limits and which will not.
Feature-based attentional integration of color and visual motion.
TLDR
Throughout, reaction times to simultaneous presentations of color and direction targets were too fast to be reconciled with models proposing separate and independent processing of such stimulus dimensions, arguing against object- and location-based accounts of attentional selection in such a task.
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search
  • J. Wolfe
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • 1994
TLDR
This paper reviews the visual search literature and presents a model of human search behavior, a revision of the guided search 2.0 model in which virtually all aspects of the model have been made more explicit and/or revised in light of new data.
A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field.
Models of attention and saccade target selection propose that within the brain there is a topographic map of visual salience that combines bottom-up and top-down influences to identify locations for
A Fronto-Posterior Network Involved in Visual Dimension Changes
TLDR
The present fMRI study revealed increased activation in the left frontopolar cortex, as well as in posterior visual areas of the dorsal and ventral streams, specific to changes in the target dimension, which suggests control of cross-dimensional attention shifts by the frontopolars cortex.
A saliency map in primary visual cortex
  • Zhaoping Li
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2002
TLDR
A model is used to show that this saliency map accounts for the way that the relative difficulties of visual search tasks depend on the features and spatial configurations of targets and distractors.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...