The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson’s disease

@article{Brigo2015TheRO,
  title={The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson’s disease},
  author={Francesco Brigo and Roberto Erro},
  journal={Neurological Sciences},
  year={2015},
  volume={36},
  pages={1045-1046}
}
Millions of people surf the Internet every day as a source of health care information looking for materials about symptoms, diagnosis, treatments and their possible adverse effects, or diagnostic procedures. Since its launch in 2001, the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has become the most popular general reference website, which contains approximately 30 million articles available in up to 287 languages and over 4.6 million English articles. With 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million… Expand
Readability of English Wikipedia's health information over time
Objective: To assess and compare the readability of the twenty-five most accessed English medical articles on Wikipedia 0, 1, 5 and 10 years ago. Design: The twenty-five most accessed WikipediaExpand
Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment
TLDR
Wikipedia pages related to autoimmune disorders are characterized by a low level of readability, and the onus is on physicians and health authorities to create, together with patients themselves, disease-specific readable sites, disseminating highly accessible health-related online information in terms of both clarity and conciseness. Expand
Why do people google movement disorders? An infodemiological study of information seeking behaviors
TLDR
Evaluated and interpret web search queries for terms related to movement disorders in English-speaking countries and their changes over time and determined the highest search volume peaks to identify possible relation with online news headlines. Expand
Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics
TLDR
It is demonstrated that Wikipedia articles related to neurosurgical topics are associated with higher grade levels for reading and also below the expected levels of clear communications for patients. Expand
Readability of online sources of information regarding epilepsy surgery and its impact on decision-making processes
TLDR
The majority of the websites analyzed in this study were found to be 'difficult' to read for the average reading level of the population, and the available online patient information literature is likely to be too difficult for theaverage reader to understand. Expand
Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future
TLDR
It is proposed that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world’s most consulted encyclopaedia. Expand
Online behavior of people visiting a scientific website on epilepsy
TLDR
The online behavior of Internet users consulting the website of the Italian Chapter of the International League Against Epilepsy (LICE) suggested two distinct populations of visitors: physicians who seek specialist information on diagnosis and management of epilepsy and lay people who seek accessible and easily comprehensible information to better understand epilepsy. Expand
Can people with multiple sclerosis actually understand what they read in the Internet age?
TLDR
The high educational level required to easily understand most websites worsens health inequalities, not allowing a full participation in health information and decision making, and the top-ten patient-oriented results were analysed for their overall level of readability. Expand
Neurology and the Internet: a review
TLDR
How the Internet is radically affecting the healthcare of people with neurological disorders and, most importantly, is shifting the paradigm of care from the hands of those who deliver care, into the handsof those who receive it is discussed. Expand
Assessing the Readability of Medical Documents: A Ranking Approach
TLDR
A ranking-based system using simple textual features and easy-to-learn word embeddings outperformed a widely used readability formula and can predict relative difficulties of medical documents. Expand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information.
TLDR
Only 1% of the top 100 Parkinson's disease information webpages are fully comprehensible to the average adult, and Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook should be the preferred measure of webpage readability. Expand
Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
TLDR
Preliminary studies indicate inadequate health literacy may increase the risk of hospitalization and future research should focus on optimal methods of screening patients to identify those with poor health literacy. Expand
Are We Effectively Informing Patients? A Quantitative Analysis of On-Line Patient Education Resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology
TLDR
The authors concluded that the patient education resources on both Web sites failed to meet the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association and members of the public may fail to fully understand these resources. Expand
Assessing the Readability of Mental Health Internet Brochures for Children and Adolescents
TLDR
All brochures met criterion on most variables but failed on those for new words (audience appropriateness) and print size, which is a favorable result in comparison with other studies that have assessed readability of mental health information on the Internet using the RAIN, although less so with reading grade levels. Expand
DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY
TLDR
During the second year, the Department of Neurology presents the course Diseases of the Nervous System (Neurol 632), which emphasizes the pathophysiology, pathology, clinical manifestations and treatment of the major neurological and neurosurgical diseases. Expand