• DOI:10.1007/S11186-010-9132-2
• Corpus ID: 32084578

The re-accomplishment of place in twentieth century Vermont and New Hampshire: history repeats itself, until it doesn’t

@article{Kaufman2011TheRO,
  title={The re-accomplishment of place in twentieth century Vermont and New Hampshire: history repeats itself, until it doesn’t},
  author={Jason Kaufman and Matthew Kaliner},
  journal={Theory and Society},
  year={2011},
  volume={40},
  pages={119-154}
}

• J. Kaufman, M. Kaliner
• Published 27 January 2011
• Sociology
• Theory and Society

Much recent literature plumbs the question of the origins and trajectories of “place,” or the cultural development of space-specific repertoires of action and meaning. This article examines divergence in two “places” that were once quite similar but are now quite far apart, culturally and politically speaking. Vermont, once considered the “most Republican” state in the United States, is now generally considered one of its most politically and culturally liberal. New Hampshire, by contrast, has remained politically and socially quite conservative. Contrasting legacies of tourist promotion, political mobilization, and public policy help explain the divergence between states. We hypothesize that emerging stereotypes about a “place” serve to draw sympathetic residents and visitors to that place, thus reinforcing the salience of those stereotypes and contributing to their reality over time. We term this latter process idio-cultural migration and argue its centrality to ongoing debates about the accomplishment of place. We also elaborate on several means by which such place “reputations” are created, transmitted, and maintained.