The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement

@article{BorgDebono2012TheQO,
  title={The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement},
  author={Victoria Borg Debono and Shiyuan Zhang and Chenglin Ye and James E. Paul and Aman Arya and Lindsay Hurlburt and Yamini Murthy and Lehana Thabane},
  journal={BMC Anesthesiology},
  year={2012},
  volume={12},
  pages={13 - 13}
}
BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are routinely used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses that help inform healthcare and policy decision making. The proper reporting of RCTs is important because it acts as a proxy for health care providers and researchers to appraise the quality of the methodology, conduct and analysis of an RCT. The aims of this study are to analyse the overall quality of reporting in 23 RCTs that were used in a meta-analysis by assessing 3 key methodological… 

Quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals: a systematic survey of the literature suggests we can do better

The quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in EM journals is low and was not significantly impacted by the publication of a dedicated CONSORT-EA.

A look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs

This study showed that PICOT framing of a research question in anesthesia-related RCTs is not often followed, and even though a statistically significant association with higher OQRS was not found, PICot framing ofA research question is still an important attribute within all R CTs.

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey

This is the first study to evaluate reporting quality of abstracts of pain journals based on CONSORT extension for abstracts and the findings will be disseminated by a presentation at a conference and through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update

The level of adherence to reporting guidelines remains suboptimal and improved adherence was associated with better study designs such as allocation concealment, random sequence, large sample sizes, adequately powered studies, multiple authorships, and being published in journals endorsing guidelines.

Quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature

This paper presents the protocol of a systematic survey of the literature, aimed at assessing the quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals and at evaluating the effect of the publication of the ConsolidatedStandards of ReportingTrials (CONSORT) extension for abstracts on thequality of reporting.

A survey on the amount of adherence to STARD and CONSORT standards in the abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies and randomized controlled trials published in International Continence Society abstract book 2011

This study revealed that the adherence level is moderate in both groups and believes that adopting these two tools would improve the reporting quality of Randomized Controlled Trials and Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

A cross-sectional study of the reporting quality of pilot or feasibility trials in high-impact anesthesia journals

The reporting quality of pilot trials published in leading anesthesia journals is poor and journal editorial boards can encourage improved reporting by supporting adherence to the CONSORT extension for pilot trials.

Completeness of reporting of quality improvement studies in neonatology is inadequate: a systematic literature survey

Reporting quality of QI studies in neonatology is inadequate and endorsing the SQUIRE 2.0 guideline is a step that journals can implement to enhance the completeness of reporting.

Evaluation of the Quality of Writing of the Title and Abstract of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Papers Published in the Journals of the Iran,s Universities of Medical Sciences in 2016, Based on the CONSORT Checklist: A Descriptive Study

The need to follow CONSORT criteria and eliminate the deficiencies mentioned for conducting these studies in the country seems necessary, and it is recommended to the authors to use the CONSORT clinical checklist while writing randomized controlled clinical trials.

Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.

There is a high prevalence of nonadherence to CONSORT guidelines among leading cardiovascular journals and efforts by editors, authors, and reviewers should be made to increase adherence and promote transparent and unbiased presentation of study results.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 73 REFERENCES

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Use of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement is associated with improvements in the quality of reports of RCTs.

Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery: Can We Do Better?

The overall quality of reporting of surgical RCTs was suboptimal and there is a need for improving awareness of the CONSORT statement among authors, reviewers, and editors of surgical journals and better quality control measures for trial reporting and methodology.

Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.

The quality of RCT reporting in general endocrine literature is suboptimal and several areas of specialization but unknown in endocrinology are highlighted.

The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement.

Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality.

Similar quality of reporting may hide important differences in methodologic quality, and well-conducted trials may be reported badly, so a clear distinction should be made between these 2 dimensions of the quality of RCTs.

Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

The concept of study quality and the methods used to assess quality are discussed and the methodology for both the assessment of quality and its incorporation into systematic reviews and meta-analysis is discussed.

Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.

The use of the selected CONSORT items is limited in these journals, possibly as many items may not be relevant to the types of studies published in clinical pharmacology journals.

The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review.

Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials

Better framing of the research question using the PICOT format is independently associated with better overall reporting quality - although the effect is small - and better reporting of key methodologies.

Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Individual quality measures are not reliably associated with the strength of treatment effect across studies and medical areas, and findings of associations with treatment effect cannot be generalized to all clinical areas or meta-analyses.
...