The puzzle of sharing scientific data

@article{PujolPriego2022ThePO,
  title={The puzzle of sharing scientific data},
  author={Laia Pujol Priego and Jonathan Wareham and Angelo K.S. Romasanta},
  journal={Industry and Innovation},
  year={2022},
  volume={29},
  pages={219 - 250}
}
ABSTRACT Government funding entities have placed data sharing at the centre of scientific policy. While there is widespread consensus that scientific data sharing benefits scientific progress, there are significant barriers to its wider adoption. We seek a deeper understanding of how researchers from different fields share their data and the barriers and facilitators of such sharing. We draw upon the notions of epistemic cultures and collective action theory to consider the enablers and… 
1 Citations
Introduction to the Special Issue on Open Innovation in Science
To address the grand challenges of our time, scientific research is increasingly conducted by crossing disciplinary, organisational, and even sectoral boundaries (Dasgupta and David 1994; Stokes

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 136 REFERENCES
What Drives Academic Data Sharing?
TLDR
It is concluded that research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.
Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories
TLDR
Findings from this study elucidate scientists’ views on ‘sharable’ forms of data—the particular representation that they view as most valued for reuse by others within their own research areas—and the anticipated duration for such reuse.
On the Reuse of Scientific Data
While science policy promotes data sharing and open data, these are not ends in themselves. Arguments for data sharing are to reproduce research, to make public assets available to the public, to
Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide
TLDR
Results point to increased acceptance of and willingness to engage in data sharing, as well as an increase in actual data sharing behaviors, while an examination of subject disciplines shows that the constraints and enablers of data sharing and reuse manifest differently across disciplines.
If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology
TLDR
It is found that CENS researchers are willing to share their data, but few are asked to do so, and in only a few domain areas do their funders or journals require them to deposit data.
The conundrum of sharing research data
  • C. Borgman
  • Political Science
    J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2012
TLDR
Four rationales for sharing data are examined, drawing examples from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities: to reproduce or to verify research, to make results of publicly funded research available to the public, to enable others to ask new questions of extant data, and to advance the state of research and innovation.
Understanding the scientific software ecosystem and its impact: Current and future measures
TLDR
This article provides a framework by which to categorize different types of measures and their relationships as they reach around from funding, development, scientific use, and through to scientific impact, and concludes with policy recommendations designed to improve insight into the scientific software ecosystem, make it more understandable, and thereby contribute to the progress of science.
Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration
TLDR
This work proposes an alternative view of metadata, focusing on its role in an ephemeral process of scientific communication, rather than as an enduring outcome or product, and argues that while metadata products can be powerful resources, usually they must be supplemented with metadata processes.
Open Science in Practice: Researcher Perspectives and Participation
TLDR
It is concluded that better support for open working, through guidelines to assist research groups in identifying the value and costs of working more openly, and further research to assess the risks, incentives and shifts in responsibility entailed by opening up the research process are needed.
...
...