The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering

@article{Carlisle2020ThePR,
  title={The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering},
  author={Daniel P. Carlisle and Pamela M. Feetham and Malcolm J. Wright and D. A. Teagle},
  journal={Climatic Change},
  year={2020},
  volume={160},
  pages={303-322}
}
  • Daniel P. Carlisle, Pamela M. Feetham, +1 author D. A. Teagle
  • Published 2020
  • Political Science
  • Climatic Change
  • International CO 2 emissions reduction commitments are insufficient to avert damaging global warming and imperil a sustainable future. Climate engineering approaches are increasingly proposed as near-term intervention strategies, but deployment of these controversial techniques will require careful engagement with and the support of the public. New quantitative measurements of public perceptions for six climate engineering approaches show that the public of the United Kingdom (UK), United… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Tables from this paper.

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 74 REFERENCES
    Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection
    • 37
    Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals
    • 43
    • PDF
    Situating and Abandoning Geoengineering: A Typology of Five Responses to Dangerous Climate Change
    • 58
    • PDF
    A review of climate geoengineering appraisals
    • 83
    • Highly Influential
    Rich man’s solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South
    • F. Biermann, I. Möller
    • Political Science
    • International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
    • 2019
    • 19
    • PDF
    Nuanced views
    • 1
    • PDF