The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering

@article{Carlisle2020ThePR,
  title={The public remain uninformed and wary of climate engineering},
  author={Daniel P. Carlisle and Pamela M. Feetham and Malcolm J. Wright and Damon A. H. Teagle},
  journal={Climatic Change},
  year={2020},
  volume={160},
  pages={303-322}
}
International CO 2 emissions reduction commitments are insufficient to avert damaging global warming and imperil a sustainable future. Climate engineering approaches are increasingly proposed as near-term intervention strategies, but deployment of these controversial techniques will require careful engagement with and the support of the public. New quantitative measurements of public perceptions for six climate engineering approaches show that the public of the United Kingdom (UK), United… 

Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways

Negative emissions technologies and solar radiation management techniques could contribute towards climate stability, either by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it permanently

Public Perceptions of Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: The Nature-Engineering Divide?

Public acceptability is a standard element on the list of potential constraints on research and deployment of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR). We outline past work on the public perceptions

Is solar geoengineering ungovernable? A critical assessment of governance challenges identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Solar radiation modification (SRM) could greatly reduce climate change and associated risks. Yet it has not been well‐received by the climate change expert community. This is evident in the

Deliberating enhanced weathering: Public frames, iconic ecosystems and the governance of carbon removal at scale

Meeting goals for ‘net zero’ emissions may require the removal of previously emitted carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. One proposal, enhanced rock weathering, aims to speed up the weathering

If humans design the planet: A call for psychological scientists to engage with climate engineering.

This article lays out some initial questions and issues a call to action to provide common ground for a conversation between climatologists, policymakers, psychological scientists, and members of the public on the important behavioral touchpoints of climate engineering.

Effects of Conspiracy Rhetoric on Views About the Consequences of Climate Change and Support for Direct Carbon Capture

ABSTRACT We implemented two survey-experiments to test the impact of conspiracy rhetoric on the views of US residents about the consequences of climate change and support for direct carbon capture.

Exploring cross-national public support for the use of enhanced weathering as a land-based carbon dioxide removal strategy

Results show that positive affect is the main predictor for support of this technique, along with perceived benefits and level of concern about climate change, and it is imperative to continue to engage the public, thereby allowing their views to be incorporated as enhanced weathering technology develops over time.

Does solar geoengineering crowd out climate change mitigation efforts? Evidence from a stated preference referendum on a carbon tax

Solar geoengineering is increasingly being considered a realistic approach to managing climate change. One crucial concern is whether geoengineering crowds out efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas

Youth co-authorship as public engagement with geoengineering

ABSTRACT Large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system is increasingly present in discussions about possible responses to climate change. Young people’s perspectives have tended to be

Public engagement with emerging technologies: Does reflective thinking affect survey responses?

The validity of surveys as a method for eliciting stable and meaningful public perceptions of emerging technologies is supported, with post hoc analysis suggesting participants with stronger views may nonetheless take more time to consider their response, without prompting.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 105 REFERENCES

Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions

ABSTRACT This paper identifies critical lessons from the climate change experience to guide how communications and engagement on negative emissions can be conducted to encourage functional public and

Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence

ABSTRACT Climate engineering (CE) and carbon capture and storage are controversial options for addressing climate change. This study compares public perception in Germany of three specific measures:

Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis

An in-depth assessment of the role of NETs in climate change mitigation scenarios, their ethical implications, as well as the challenges involved in bringing the various NETs to the market and scaling them up in time are clarified.

Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection

Injecting sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere could quickly offset global warming caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Because the technology would have global side effects, it raises

Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals

Based on present knowledge, climate geoengineering techniques cannot be relied on to significantly contribute to meeting the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Situating and Abandoning Geoengineering: A Typology of Five Responses to Dangerous Climate Change

  • C. Heyward
  • Environmental Science
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2013
Geoengineering, the “deliberate, large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment in order to counteract anthropogenic climate change” (Shepherd et al. 2009, 1), is attracting increasing

A review of climate geoengineering appraisals

Deliberate large‐scale interventions in the Earth's climate system—known collectively as ‘geoengineering’—have been proposed in order to moderate anthropogenic climate change. Amidst a backdrop of

Rich man’s solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South

  • F. BiermannI. Möller
  • Environmental Science
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
  • 2019
Numerous recent studies project that ‘climate engineering’ technologies might need to play a major role in the future. Such technologies may carry major risks for developing countries that are often

Nuanced views

Most major surveys of attitudes towards economic growth and environmental protection have generally framed the two in diametric terms, which can lead to results that don’t allow respondents to engage
...