Corpus ID: 235795032

The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four well-known bibliometric databases

@article{Purnell2021ThePA,
  title={The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four well-known bibliometric databases},
  author={P. Purnell},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2021},
  volume={abs/2107.04887}
}
Research managers benchmarking universities against international peers face the problem of affiliation disambiguation. Different databases have taken separate approaches to this problem and discrepancies exist between them. Bibliometric data sources typically conduct a disambiguation process that unifies variant institutional names and those of its sub-units so that researchers can then search all records from that institution using a single unified name. This study examined affiliation… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings
TLDR
Detailed bibliographic comparisons between three key databases are performed and it is suggested that robust evaluation measures need to consider the effect of choice of data sources and recommend an approach where data from multiple sources is integrated to provide a more robust dataset. Expand
Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems
TLDR
The key finding is that for the sample institutions, the studied systems provide bibliometric indicator values that have only a limited accuracy, and additional data cleaning for disambiguating affiliation data is recommended. Expand
A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus
TLDR
There is a need for rigorous quality control guidelines to govern database managers and editors to prevent the creation of duplicates in Scopus. Expand
Detecting referential inconsistencies in electronic CV datasets
TLDR
A heuristic-based approach that uses similarity search to match papers from coauthors of CV is proposed and used to analyze over 2000 curricula of researchers from a given institution recovered from the Lattes Platform, indicating 18.98% of the analyzed publications present referential inconsistencies. Expand
Universities through the eyes of bibliographic databases: a retroactive growth comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
TLDR
This work proves that the url-based method to calculate institutional productivity in GS is not a good proxy for the total number of publications indexed in WoS and Scopus, at least in the national context analyzed. Expand
Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus
TLDR
The results show a generally increased percentage of items with DOI in all the disciplines in both databases, which provide very similar numbers and trends. Expand
Missing author address information in Web of Science-An explorative study
TLDR
The findings reveal that from 1900 to 2015 over one-fifth of the publications indexed in WoS have completely missing information from the address field, and that the problem of partially missing address information for U.S. research has diminished dramatically since 1998. Expand
The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university
TLDR
It is concluded that MA is on the verge of becoming a bibliometric superpower and shows biases similar to Scopus and WoS with regard to the coverage of the humanities, non-English publications, and open-access publications. Expand
Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels
TLDR
It is found that close to half of all documents in Dimensions are not associated with any country of affiliation while the proportion of documents without this data in Scopus is much lower, which affects the possibilities that Dimensions can offer as instruments for carrying out bibliometric analyses at the country and institutional level. Expand
Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases
TLDR
Bibliometric database errors in DOI indexing, in particular, the incorrect assignment of a single DOI to multiple papers is raised, which is quite interesting since DOI is commonly regarded as an effective means to identify scientific articles unambiguously. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...