The powers and pitfalls of parsimony

@article{Stewart1993ThePA,
  title={The powers and pitfalls of parsimony},
  author={C B Stewart},
  journal={Nature},
  year={1993},
  volume={361},
  pages={603-607}
}
Parsimony analysis is a powerful tool for the study of biological evolution. It is used to construct phylogenetic trees, to evaluate alternative hypotheses objectively, and to study evolutionary pattern and process. Yet, as comparative data sets expand, the pitfalls of parsimony analysis are catching experts and novices alike. 
Is parsimony a justified criterion in the assessment of possible phylogenetic reconstructions
TLDR
It can be concluded that parsimony analysis cannot be used in evolutionary studies with any confidence and that, if it is renounced, as it appears necessary, current methods of cladistic analysis become unmanageable.
Introduction to Inferring Evolutionary Relationships
  • R. Page
  • Biology
    Current protocols in bioinformatics
  • 2003
This unit provides a general introduction to phylogeny. It defines common terms and discusses the issue of rooting trees, in addition to comparing gene and species trees. Methods for inferring
A composite estimate of primate phylogeny.
  • A. Purvis
  • Biology
    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1995
TLDR
The composite tree is derived by applying a parsimony algorithm to over a hundred previous estimates, and is well resolved, containing 160 nodes, and will be a useful framework for comparative biologists.
Genome composition with mismatches and its application to phylogeny
TLDR
An alignment-free approach which considers the mutual occurrences of l-mers with at most k mismatches between a pair of DNA sequences in order to define a distance the species, which leads to reliable phylogenetic trees.
A frequency-dependent significance test for parsimony.
TLDR
A recently described frequency-dependent significance test is extended to handle any number of taxa and a modification of the Kishino-Hasegawa sites test is described, useful for detecting historical signals beyond those patterns which arise purely from irregular base compositions between the compared sequences.
Progress and pitfalls in systematics: cladistics, DNA and morphology
TLDR
Molecular approaches separate phylogenetic reconstruction from biological evaluation and will never replace morphological analysis in Systematics, but molecular methods also facilitate the direct investigation of morphological evolution by revealing the genetic basis of morphogenesis in model systems or by permitting the genetic analysis of diagnostic character changes by genetic mapping.
The Origin and Early Development of the Method of Minimum Evolution for the Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Trees
TLDR
The method of minimum evolution was introduced by Edwards and Cavalli-Sforza (1963) and its relationship to the subsequently developed parsimony methods and the logical basis of the methods are discussed, with special reference to probability models.
TOPIARY PRUNING AND WEIGHTING REINFORCE AN AFRICAN ORIGIN FOR THE HUMAN MITOCHONDRIAL DNA TREE
  • C. Wills
  • Computer Science
    Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
  • 1996
TLDR
The ability of topiary pruning to “unscramble” artificial data sets that have high levels of homoplasy is demonstrated, and is shown to be similar in its effects to the weighting method of Kluge and Farris (1969), although with the additional advantage of reducing the number of taxa to the point where bootstrapping is feasible.
Phylogenetic place of guinea pigs: no support of the rodent-polyphyly hypothesis from maximum-likelihood analyses of multiple protein sequences.
TLDR
The overall evidence does not support Graur et al.'s hypothesis, which radically contradicts the traditional view of rodent monophyly, and demonstrates that one must be careful in choosing a proper method for phylogenetic inference and that an argument based on a small data set (with respect to the length of the sequence and especially the number of species) may be unstable.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
The comparative method for studying adaptation why worry about phylogeny? reconstructing phylogenetic trees and ancestral character states comparative analysis of discrete data comparative analysis
Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics
TLDR
This paper presents a systematic literature review of taxation alternatives to the PHYLOGENETIC system and some of the methods used, as well as some new ideas, that arose during this review.
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES
TLDR
This paper shows how suitable evolutionary models can be constructed and applied objectively and how the type of data will affect both the method of treatment and the validity of the results.
Statistical tests of molecular phylogenies.
A strategy for sequence phylogeny research
TLDR
A procedure is illustrated which circumvents the computational difficulty of evaluating the astronomically large number of possible trees, without resorting to suboptimal methods.
Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability.
Article de synthese sur les methodes d'obtention de phylogenese a partir de sequences moleculaires, tests statistiques des phylogeneses et simulations sur ordinateur
Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny.
TLDR
A system based on serial propagation of bacteriophage T7 in the presence of a mutagen was used to create the first completely known phylogeny, which predicted the correct topology but varied in their predictions of branch lengths.
The Compleat Cladist: A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures
The core concept of phylogenetic systematics is the use of derived or apomorphic characters to reconstruct common ancestry relationships and the grouping of taxa based on common ancestry. This
Gene Trees and Species Trees: Molecular Systematics as One-Character Taxonomy
TLDR
A character phylogeny, in this case a gene tree, can be tested best by a parsimony analysis in which other characters are included, and each is an equivalent phylogenetic hypothesis, as is each non-molecular character, leading to the suggestion that direct combination is appropriate.
...
...