The politics of deceptive borders: 'biomarkers of deceit' and the case of iBorderCtrl

@article{SanchezMonedero2019ThePO,
  title={The politics of deceptive borders: 'biomarkers of deceit' and the case of iBorderCtrl},
  author={Javier S'anchez-Monedero and Lina Dencik},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2019},
  volume={abs/1911.09156}
}
This paper critically examines a recently developed proposal for a border control system called iBorderCtrl, designed to detect deception based on facial recognition technology and the measurement of micro-expressions, termed 'biomarkers of deceit'. Funded under the European Commission's Horizon 2020 programme, we situate our analysis in the wider political economy of 'emotional AI' and the history of deception detection technologies. We then move on to interrogate the design of iBorderCtrl… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 102 REFERENCES
Deception Detection using Real-life Trial Data
Silent talker: a new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
  • C. F. Bond, B. Depaulo
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2006
Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness
Thermal Facial Analysis for Deception Detection
Comparing risks of alternative medical diagnosis using Bayesian arguments
Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
  • J. Simpson
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • 2008
Deception: Detection of
...
1
2
3
4
5
...