The paradoxical consequences of revenge.

@article{Carlsmith2008ThePC,
  title={The paradoxical consequences of revenge.},
  author={Kevin M. Carlsmith and Timothy D. Wilson and Daniel T. Gilbert},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={2008},
  volume={95 6},
  pages={
          1316-24
        }
}
People expect to reap hedonic rewards when they punish an offender, but in at least some instances, revenge has hedonic consequences that are precisely the opposite of what people expect. Three studies showed that (a) one reason for this is that people who punish continue to ruminate about the offender, whereas those who do not punish "move on" and think less about the offender, and (b) people fail to appreciate the different affective consequences of witnessing and instigating punishment. 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Get the Message

Results from three studies demonstrate that victims’ justice-related satisfaction with punishment is influenced by the kind of feedback they receive from offenders after punishment, and that punishment per se is neither satisfying nor dissatisfying.

Sweet Revenge Feels Less Bitter: Spontaneous Affective Reactions After Revenge Taking

Previous studies suggested that people feel better after revenge taking, while other studies showed that they feel worse. The interpretation of this research is however ambiguous due to its extensive

The satisfaction is mine: revenge seeking following extrinsic reward.

The extrinsic reward should impede revenge-seeking if revenge is solely driven by the desire to feel gratified. Study 1 (N = 114) showed that satisfaction from receiving monetary compensation

The Unburdening Effects of Forgiveness

Research shows that in the aftermath of conflict, forgiveness improves victims’ well-being and the victim–offender relationship. Building on the research on embodied perception and economy of action,

What stops revenge taking? Effects of observed emotional reactions on revenge seeking.

What reaction stops revenge taking? Four experiments (total N = 191) examined this question where the victim of an interpersonal transgression could observe the offender's reaction (anger, sadness,

Retribution and forgiveness: The healing effects of punishing for just deserts

Although punishment and forgiveness frequently are considered to be opposites, in the present paper we propose that victims who punish their offender are subsequently more likely to forgive. Notably,

Do Victims of Injustice Punish to Improve Their Mood?

Previous research has shown that angry people sometimes aggress to improve their mood. The present research tests whether people who have been treated unjustly seek revenge (i.e., retributive

Truth or Punishment: Secrecy and Punishing the Self

It is demonstrated that thinking about secret (vs. confessed) misdeeds leads to increased self-punishment (increased denial of pleasure and seeking of pain), and those who seek an escape from justice by keeping secrets may in fact end up serving that same justice on themselves (through self- Punishment).

Situational precursors of revenge: Social exclusion, relationship type, and opportunity

Little is known about the situational factors that turn feelings of revenge into actual acts of revenge. Addressing this gap in the literature, this study selected a representative sample of people
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

Envy and Schadenfreude

To test the hypothesis that Schadenfreude, pleasure at the suffering of others, will result when an envied person experiences a misfortune, envy was created in subjects by asking them to watch a

The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment

Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation.

A proposed revision of the Dollard et al. (1939) frustration-aggression hypothesis holds that frustrations generate aggressive inclinations to the degree that they arouse negative affect.

Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.

The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs, and revealed that despite strongly stated preferences for deterrence theory, individual sentencing decisions seemed driven exclusively by just deserts concerns.

Incapacitation and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment

Only in a case in which a brain tumor was identified as the cause of an actor's violent action, a case that does not fit the standard prototype of a crime intentionally committed, did respondents show a desire to incarcerate the actor in order to prevent future harms rather than assigning a just deserts based punishment.

Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes.

The results demonstrate that errors in affective forecasting can lead people to behave in ways that do not optimize their happiness and well-being.

Anticipated Emotions as Guides to Choice

When making decisions, people often anticipate the emotions they might experience as a result of the outcomes of their choices. In the process, they simulate what life would be like with one outcome

Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

Evidence for a distraction interpretation is found, that people who think about future events moderate their forecasts because they believe that these events will reduce thinking about the focal event.

Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice

Malicious pleasure: schadenfreude at the suffering of another group.

The results establish schadenfreude as an emotion that is moderated by the salient dimensions of particular intergroup relations.