The origin of the Everettian heresy $

@inproceedings{Osnaghi2009TheOO,
  title={The origin of the Everettian heresy \$},
  author={S. Osnaghi and F{\'a}bio Freitas and Olival Jr. Freire},
  year={2009}
}
In 1956, Hugh Everett, then a PhD student at Princeton, proposed his ‘‘relative state’’ formulation of quantum mechanics. John Wheeler, who was Everett’s advisor, recognized the originality and importance of such a proposal, but he denied that its non-conventional approach to measurement questioned the orthodox view. Indeed, Wheeler made serious efforts to obtain the blessing of Niels Bohr for Everett’s ideas. These efforts gave rise to a lively debate with the Copenhagen group, the existence… Expand
Making Sense of the Many Worlds Interpretation
It has been 61 years since Hugh Everett III's PhD dissertation, {\it On the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics}, was submitted to the Princeton University Physics Department. After more than a decadeExpand
The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics
In this work we analyze the deep link between the 20th Century positivist re-foundation of physics and the famous measurement problem of quantum mechanics. We attempt to show why this is not anExpand
Revisiting the Genesis of ‘Many-Worlds'
It is often claimed that Wheeler insisted on a revision and consequently shortening of Everett’s PhD thesis, partly because of his anticipation to reconcile the theory with Bohr’s approach. In thisExpand
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Decoherence is like capitalism. Its proponents regard it as obvious, given human nature, and its success seems overwhelming. Competitors largely belong to the past, or get the impression they do.Expand
Against 'Particle Metaphysics' and 'Collapses' within the Definition of Quantum Entanglement
In this paper we argue against the orthodox definition of quantum entanglement which has been explicitly grounded on several “common sense” (metaphysical) presuppositions and presents today seriousExpand
Niels Bohr as Philosopher of Experiment: Does Decoherence Theory Challenge Bohr's Doctrine of Classical Concepts?
Niels Bohr's doctrine of the primacy of "classical concepts" is arguably his most criticized and misunderstood view. We present a new, careful historical analysis that makes clear that Bohr'sExpand
Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, “It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.”)
TLDR
In contraposition, following Einstein's claim according to which “it is only the theory which decides what can be observed”, this work proposes a return to the realist representational understanding of ‘physical theories’ in which ‘observation’ is considered as derived from theoretical presuppositions. Expand
Multiplicity in Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics
TLDR
It is concluded that much remains to be done to clarify and specify Everett's approach to quantum mechanics, as the spectrum of opinions on various ontological questions raised byverett's approach is rather large. Expand
Special Issue – Historiography of Physics Power Relations in Science: The Bohr and Wheeler-Everett Dialogue on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics1
Pierre Bourdieu challenged the notions of science when he presented it as a field of peers competing for the monopoly of scientific authority. As scientific capital equals power, science disputesExpand
On the Quantum Measurement Problem
In this paper, I attempt a personal account of my understanding of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, which has been largely in the tradition of the Copenhagen interpretation. I assumeExpand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 109 REFERENCES
The Historical Roots of ‘‘Foundations of Quantum Physics’’ as a Field of Research (1950–1970)
The rising interest, in the late 20th century, in the foundations of quantum physics, a subject in which Franco Selleri has excelled, has suggested the fair question: how did it become so? TheExpand
THE INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS*
  • M. Born
  • Physics
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1953
THE following pages are a reply to Erwin Schrodinger's article, ' Are There Quantum Jumps ? Parts I and II ' , published in August and November 1952, in this Journal. A discussion on this subject wasExpand
The Chimerical Cat: Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective
The establishment of the Heisenberg-Schrodinger quantum mechanics in 1926 was undoubtedly the most important event m the history of twentieth-century science - for science itself, even if not forExpand
Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy in the Research on the Foundations of Quantum Physics: E.P. Wigner's Case #
Dealing with Eugene Wigner’s ideas on the measurement procedure in quantum physics and unearthing the controversy that pitted him against supporters of the interpretation of complementarity, I willExpand
Advantages and disadvantages of various interpretations of the quantum theory
Joseph Henry's genius was attracted primarily to the great experimental problems of his age. Although he was a professor of natural philosophy, a discipline which a century ago combined the variousExpand
The nature of Einstein's objections to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics
In what follows, I examine three main points which may help us to understand the deep nature of Einstein's objections to quantum mechanics. After having played a fundamental pioneer role in the birthExpand
Science and exile: David Bohm, the cold war, and a new interpretation of quantum mechanics
ABSTRACT In the early 1950s the American physicist David Bohm (1917-1992) produced a new interpretation of quantum mechanics and had to flee from McCarthyism. Rejected at Princeton, he moved to SaaoExpand
Some Worlds of Quantum Theory
Abstract: This paper assesses the Everettian approach to the measurement problem, especially the version of that approach advocated by Simon Saunders and David Wallace. I emphasise conceptual, indeedExpand
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation
According to the standard view, the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classicExpand
Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism
How should we read Bohr? The answer to this question is by no means clear, not least because for a long period of time Bohr has not been read but rather mythologized, and his views “almostExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...