The norm of assertion: Empirical data

  title={The norm of assertion: Empirical data},
  author={Markus Kneer},

Figures from this paper

Should I say that? An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion
Truth, fallibility, and justification: new studies in the norms of assertion
  • J. Turri
  • Philosophy, Psychology
  • 2020
This paper advances the understanding of the norms of assertion by evaluating whether it was due to stimuli mentioning that a speaker’s evidence was fallible, and evaluating the hypothesis that assertion has a truth-insensitive standard of justification.
Assertion is weak
Recent work has argued that belief is weak: the level of rational credence required for belief is relatively low. That literature has  contrasted belief with assertion, arguing that the latter
Revisiting norms of assertion
Epistemic evaluation and the need for ‘impure’ epistemic standards
That knowledge ascriptions exhibit some form of sensitivity to context is uncontroversial. How best to account for the context-sensitivity at issue, however, is the topic of heated debates. A certain
Predicates of personal taste: empirical data
According to contextualism, the extension of claims of personal taste is dependent on the context of utterance. According to truth relativism, their extension depends on the context of assessment. On
Assertion: The Constitutive Rule Account and the Engagement Condition Objection
Many philosophers, following Williamson (The Philosophical Review 105(4): 489–523, 1996), Williamson (Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000), subscribe to the constitutive
Empirical Studies on Truth and the Project of Re‐engineering Truth
Most philosophers have largely downplayed any relevance of multiple meanings of the folk concept of truth in the empirical domain. However, confusions about what truth is have surged in political
Sharing Knowledge
Assertion is the central vehicle for the sharing of knowledge. Whether knowledge is shared successfully often depends on the quality of assertions: good assertions lead to successful knowledge


The test of truth: An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion
  • J. Turri
  • Philosophy, Psychology
  • 2013
Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility
The view that assertions are governed by the rule that we should assert only what we know, is enjoying growing popularity. This paper argues that it is more plausible to assume that assertions are
The status of the knowledge account of assertion
It is argued here that the knowledge rule is not the constitutive rule of assertion in any sense of the term, as it governs only some assertions rather than all of them.
Assertion, Knowledge, and Context
The positions under discussion are both located in the area of overlap between epistemology and the philosophy of language, and they have both received a good deal of attention in recent years. But
Must We Know What We Say
The knowledge account of assertion seems to provide a clear and simple connection between the key concept of epistemology, knowledge, and a key concept of philosophy of language, assertion. According
Knowing and Asserting
Assertions are praised as true, informative, relevant, sincere, warranted, well-phrased, or polite. They are criticized as false, uninformative, irrelevant, insincere, unwarranted, ill-phrased, or
Knowledge and assertion in “Gettier” cases
Abstract Assertion is fundamental to our lives as social and cognitive beings. By asserting, we share knowledge, coordinate behavior, and advance collective inquiry. Accordingly, assertion is of
What Is Assertion
To assert something is to perform a certain kind of act. This act is different in kind both from other speech acts, like questions, requests, commands, promises, and apologies, and from acts that are
Knowledge and Assertion
Leading proponents of a wide variety of contemporary accounts of knowledge assume that knowledge is the norm of assertion. The assumption is central to the debate between contextualists and
Knowledge and the norm of assertion: a simple test
An impressive case has been built for the hypothesis that knowledge is the norm of assertion, but the knowledge account has not yet been tested directly, so this paper fills the gap by reporting the results of such a test.