The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK

@article{Bornmann2018TheNE,
  title={The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK},
  author={Lutz Bornmann and Jonathan Adams and Loet Leydesdorff},
  journal={J. Informetrics},
  year={2018},
  volume={12},
  pages={931-949}
}
When the Data Don’t Mean What They Say: Japan’s Comparative Underperformance in Citation Impact
The significant gap in citation impact performance between Japan and other nations with advanced scientific research systems invites investigation. The honoree of this festschrift has explored
Measuring the citation context of national self‐references
The emphasis on research evaluation has brought scrutiny to the role of self‐citations in the scholarly communication process. While author self‐citations have been studied at length, little is known
A comparative study of domestic and cross‐country impact of Chinese and U.S. publications in chemistry
Based on publications in Chemistry in 2015, this paper investigated the citation impact on domestic and foreign scholarly communities of Chinese and US publications, and to what extent does such
Measuring national self-referencing patterns of major science producers
TLDR
While the results highlight a continuing decline of national references, all countries’ referencing patterns remain heavily oriented towards national papers throughout the 1980–2017 period, indicating that national referencing patterns are more pronounced in social sciences and humanities than in natural sciences and engineering and biomedical sciences.
Global science and national comparisons: beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics
ABSTRACT In the last three decades, a networked global system has emerged in the natural-science-based disciplines, sustained by collegial epistemic relations in universities. Nationally ordered and
How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess
TLDR
This paper considers self-referencing and self-citing, describes the typical shape of self-Citation patterns for carefully curated publication sets authored by 3517 Highly Cited Researchers and quantifies the variance in the distribution ofSelf-citation rates within and between all 21 Essential Science Indicators’ fields.
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World
TLDR
An all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place is provided.
‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
TLDR
China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system, investigating the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 86 REFERENCES
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
TLDR
The results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science, however, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles.
Is the United States Losing Ground in Science? A Global Perspective on the World Science System
Based on the Science Citation Index-Expanded web-version,the USA is still by far the strongest nation in terms of scientifi c performance.Its relative decline in percentage share of publications is
Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system
Based on the Science Citation Index-Expanded web-version, the USA is still by far the strongest nation in terms of scientific performance. Its relative decline in percentage share of publications is
BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers
TLDR
With the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top‐cited countries worldwide.
Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends
TLDR
Using the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010 to show significantly increasing trends in citation impactvalues for France, the UK, and especially Germany.
The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals: Some Problems with the Use of Scientometric Indicators in Journal and Research Evaluations
We analyze the citation impacts (‘cited’) and citation practices (‘citing’) of sociological journals which publish in German, and discuss drawbacks of using the journal impact factor (IF) to assess
Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database
TLDR
The main conclusion coming out of this study is that, given the strong presence of the USA in the WoS database, the comparative rankings tend, by construction, to give a citation advantage to countries having the closest relation to that country.
...
...