The myth of national self-defence

@inproceedings{Rodin2014TheMO,
  title={The myth of national self-defence},
  author={David Emanuel Rodin},
  year={2014}
}
The right of national self-defence—though deeply entrenched and of long-standing—is a myth, unsupported by coherent moral reasoning. Were states to possess the extraordinary defensive rights attributed by just war theory and the laws of armed conflict, it would have to be the case that states or proto-state groups possess an unusual form of moral value not shared by other social groups. Through an extended discussion of a corporate takeover example, the chapter shows this not to be the case. In… Expand
Rodin on Self-Defense and the “Myth” of National Self-Defense: A Refutation
David Rodin denies that defensive wars against unjust aggression can be justified if the unjust aggression limits itself, for example, to the annexation of territory, the robbery of resources or theExpand
Toward a Collectivist National Defense
Most philosophers writing on the ethics of war endorse “reductivist individualism,” a view that holds both that killing in war is subject to the very same principles of ordinary moralityExpand
The Ethics of War: A New Individualist Rights-Based Account of Just Cause and Legitimate Authority
My thesis focuses upon the ad bellum criteria of just cause and, to a lesser extent, legitimate authority. I begin by developing an account of the individual right to self-defence, grounded upon theExpand
Dignity, Self-Respect, and Bloodless Invasions
In Chapter 7, “Dignity, Self-Respect, and Bloodless Invasions”, Saba Bazargan-Forward asks How much violence can we impose on those attempting to politically subjugate us? According toExpand
The state right of self-defense: A claim in need of justification
Jennifer Kling: The State Right of Self-Defense: A Claim in Need of Justification (Under the direction of Bernard Boxill) My dissertation focuses on the nature and conditions of the state right ofExpand
Collectivism and Individualism in the Ethics of War
This chapter explores the ongoing debate in the ethics of war between the traditional collectivist accounts of war, and revisionist reductive individualist accounts. I begin by reflecting on theExpand
Revolution Against Non-violent Oppression
Oppressive governments that use violence against citizens, e.g. murder and torture, are usually thought of as liable to armed revolutionary attack by the oppressed population. But oppression may beExpand
Just War Theory: Revisionists versus Traditionalists
Contemporary just war theory is divided into two broad camps: revisionists and traditionalists. Traditionalists seek to provide moral foundations for something close to current international law, andExpand
Political Independence, Territorial Integrity and Private Law Analogies
Abstract Kant deploys analogies from private law in describing relations between states. I explore the relation between these analogies and the broader Kantian idea of the distinctively public natureExpand
Just war and robot's killings
May lethal autonomous weapons systems—‘killer robots’—be used in war? The majority of writers argue against their use, and those who have argued in favour have done so on a consequentialist basis. WeExpand
...
1
2
...