The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.

  title={The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.},
  author={Nicholas Evans and Stephen C. Levinson},
  journal={The Behavioral and brain sciences},
  volume={32 5},
          429-48; discussion 448-494
Talk of linguistic universals has given cognitive scientists the impression that languages are all built to a common pattern. In fact, there are vanishingly few universals of language in the direct sense that all languages exhibit them. Instead, diversity can be found at almost every level of linguistic organization. This fundamentally changes the object of enquiry from a cognitive science perspective. This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Unity and diversity in human language
  • W. Fitch
  • Linguistics
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2011
This work reviews the literature on linguistic diversity and language universals, suggesting that an adequate notion of ‘formal universals’ provides a promising way to understand the facts of language acquisition, offering order in the face of the diversity of human languages.
There is considerable variation across the languages of the world, nonetheless it is possible to discern common patterns in how languages are structured and used. The underlying source of this
Linguistic diversity and universals
e phenomenon of human language appears in two opposite manifestations: on the one hand, the phenomenon manifests itself in thousands of individual languages, dialects and sociolects, and these come
Pronouns, agreement and classifiers: What sign languages can tell us about linguistic diversity and linguistic universals
This paper considers three morphosyntactic phenomena found in sign languages that have traditionally been assumed to be the same as spoken languages but which, on closer inspection, reveal some fundamental differences relating to particular affordances of the visual-spatial modality.
What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it?
This paper critically examines a variety of arguments that have been put forward as evidence for UG, focussing on the three most powerful ones: universality (all human languages share a number of properties), convergence (all language learners converge on the same grammar in spite of the fact that they are exposed to different input), and poverty of the stimulus (children know things about language which they could not have learned from the input available to them).
The Place of Universal Grammar in the Study of Language and Mind: A Response to Dabrowska (2015)
Abstract Generative Linguistics proposes that the human ability to produce and comprehend language is fundamentally underwritten by a uniquely linguistic innate system called Universal Grammar (UG).
Chapter 11. The role of adaptation in understanding linguistic diversity
This chapter argues that in addition to this non-functional process of drift, language change and diversification can be explained in functional terms as adaptations to social, demographic, and ecological environments in which the languages are learned and used, and proposes the linguistic niche hypothesis.
Language death and diversity: philosophical and linguistic implications
Much of this reflects (or even summarizes) Davidson’s philosophical program, but much of it also reflects a (perhaps, defining) tendency in analytic philosophy as a whole: language, especially


Systematicity and Natural Language Syntax
A lengthy debate in the philosophy of the cognitive sciences has turned on whether the phenomenon known as 'systematicity' of language and thought shows that connectionist explanatory aspirations are
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Language universals in the brain: How linguistic are they?
Anybody’s search for language universals will depend on certain assumptions that are not themselves scientific in the strict sense of the empirical sciences, since they cannot be subjected to
Language Universals
The evolution of human language has received a considerable amount of interest in recent years, which is reflected by a wealth of publications (for an overview, see Behme, 2009). While most experts
Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution
Foundations of Language shows one of the most fundamental new thinkings in linguistics since Noam Chomskyis Aspects of the Theory of Syntax in 1965. Foundations of Language opens up vivid new
Language is not an instinct
The Roots of Linguistic Organization in a New Language.
In ABSL, the beginnings of phonology, morphology, syntax, and prosody are identified, and the linguistic elements found in ABSL are not exclusively holistic, nor are they all compositional, but a combination of both.
Methods for Finding Language Universals in Syntax
There are two broad theoretical traditions in research on syntactic universals, the typological and the generative. While the theoretical differences between the two approaches are well known, less
Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition: Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax
This chapter formally investigates the interaction of these two unique properties of human language: the way it is learned and its syntactic structure.