The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis

  title={The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis},
  author={Taha Yasseri and Anselm Spoerri and Mark Graham and J{\'a}nos Kert{\'e}sz},
We present, visualize and analyse the similarities and differences between the controversial topics related to “edit wars” identified in 10 different language versions of Wikipedia. After a brief review of the related work we describe the methods developed to locate, measure, and categorize the controversial topics in the different languages. Visualizations of the degree of overlap between the top 100 list of most controversial articles in different languages and the content related… 
Locating foci of translation on Wikipedia: Some methodological proposals
A number of proposals towards a possible methodology for discovering where the main foci of this new type of collaborative translation are located are located include the use of the encyclopaedia’s list-based structure and of different features of page anatomy.
Writing the World in 301 Languages: A Political Geography of the Online Encyclopedia Wikipedia
  • V. Mamadouh
  • Sociology
    Handbook of the Changing World Language Map
  • 2019
Wikipedia is a free-access, free content Internet encyclopedia created in 2001. One key characteristic of the encyclopedia is its linguistic plurality. Wikipedia consists of 301 language versions,
Linguistic neighbourhoods: explaining cultural borders on Wikipedia through multilingual co-editing activity
This study sheds light on how culture is reflected in the collective process of archiving knowledge on Wikipedia, and demonstrates that cross-lingual interconnections on Wikipedia are not dominated by one powerful language.
Cultural diversity of quality of information on Wikipedias
It is demonstrated that high‐quality standards in information presentation are not globally shared and that in many aspects, the language culture's influence determines what is perceived to be proper, desirable, and exemplary for encyclopedic entries.
Highlighting Entanglement of Cultures via Ranking of Multilingual Wikipedia Articles
It is found that local heroes are dominant but also global heroes exist and create an effective network representing entanglement of cultures through ranking of multilingual Wikipedia articles.
Quantifying national information interests using the activity of Wikipedia editors
It is shown that countries are divided into 18 clusters with similar interest profiles in which language, geography, and historical background polarize the interests, and that people nevertheless care about local information.
Interactions of Cultures and Top People of Wikipedia from Ranking of 24 Language Editions
Considering historical figures who appear in multiple editions as interactions between cultures, a network of cultures is constructed and the most influential cultures are identified according to this network.
Lost in Translation: Contexts, Computing, Disputing on Wikipedia
Wikipedia is an open collaboration, global, multilingual project. Its guidelines and policies direct the collaboration process into a vision of objective and neutral encyclopedic knowledge. However,
Cultural Differences in the Understanding of History on Wikipedia
This paper sheds light on cultural differences in the understanding of historical military events between Chinese, English, French, German, and Swedish Wikipedia language editions. Differences in


Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: a comparative study
This work compares five different methods for modelling and identifying controversy within unmarked articles, and discusses some of the unique difficulties and opportunities inherent to the way Wikipedia is produced.
What's in Wikipedia?: mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure
A mapping technique is introduced that takes advantage of socially-annotated hierarchical categories while dealing with the inconsistencies and noise inherent in the distributed way that they are generated in Wikipedia.
On ranking controversies in wikipedia: models and evaluation
Three models are proposed to identify controversial articles in Wikipedia, namely the Basic model and two Controversy Rank (CR) models, which draw clues from collaboration and edit history instead of interpreting the actual articles or edited content.
Content Disputes in Wikipedia Reflect Geopolitical Instability
The ‘guilt by association’ principle often used in biological networks to the information network within the online encyclopedia Wikipedia is applied to create an indicator quantifying the degree to which pages linked to a country are disputed by contributors.
What is popular on Wikipedia and why?
This paper analyzes which pages and topics are the most popular on Wikipedia and why and helps to explain how search engines, and Google in particular, fuel the growth and shape what ispopular on Wikipedia.
Circadian Patterns of Wikipedia Editorial Activity: A Demographic Analysis
Using the cumulative data of 34 Wikipedias in different languages, the universalities and differences in temporal activity patterns of editors are characterized and the geographical distribution of editors for each WP in the globe is estimated.
Visualizing the overlap between the 100 most visited pages on Wikipedia for September 2006 to January 2007
This paper compares the monthly lists of the 100 most visited Wikipedia pages for the period of September 2006 to January 2007 and finds that almost 40 percent of a month’s top 100 pages are visited in all five months, whereas 25 percent are highly visited only in a single month.
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia
This work builds up samples of controversial and peaceful articles and analyze the temporal characteristics of the activity in these samples, and identifies three distinct developmental patterns for the overall behavior of the articles.
Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader
As part of the CPOV project with the Institute of Network Cultures, we published a Wikipedia reader titled Critical Point of View. The Reader is edited by Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz. The
Measuring self-focus bias in community-maintained knowledge repositories
Two methods to quantify self- focus are outlined, one of which is very computationally inexpensive, and empirical evidence for the existence of self-focus is presented using a "hyperlingual" approach that examines 15 different language editions of Wikipedia.