The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas

  title={The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas},
  author={Daniel M. Bartels and David A Pizarro},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Sometimes Psychopaths get it Right: A Utilitarian Response to ‘The Mismeasure of Morals’

A well-publicized study entitled ‘The Mismeasure of Morals’ (Bartels and Pizarro, 2011) purportedly provides evidence that utilitarian solutions to a particular class of moral dilemmas are endorsed

Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.

It is shown that individual differences in reasoning ability and cognitive style of thinking are positively associated with a preference for utilitarian solutions, but bear no relationship to harm-relevant concerns.

Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment

The results reveal a key relationship between moral judgment and empathic concern in particular (i.e., feelings of warmth and compassion in response to someone in distress) and Utilitarian participants showed significantly reduced empathy concern on an independent empathy measure.

Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?

Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology

A new scale is developed, refine, and validate to dissociate individual differences in the ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ dimensions of utilitarian thinking as manifested in the general population, and it is shown that these are two independent dimensions of proto-utilitarian tendencies in the lay population, each exhibiting a distinct psychological profile.

Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia

It is found that trait alexithymia, which is well-known to have deficits in empathy, was indeed associated with increased utilitarian tendencies on emotionally aversive personal moral dilemmas and this was due to reduced empathic concern for the victim.

Psychopathy and Moral Dilemma Judgments: A CNI Model Analysis of Personal and Perceived Societal Standards

Research on moral dilemma judgment suggests that higher levels of psychopathy are associated with a greater preference for utilitarian over deontological judgments. The current research investigated

Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas

The findings suggest that gender differences in moral dilemma judgments are due to differences in affective responses to harm rather than cognitive evaluations of outcomes.



Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care.

The results force a rejection of the strong hypothesis that emotional processes are causally necessary for judgments of moral dilemmas, suggesting instead that psychopaths understand the distinction between right and wrong, but do not care about such knowledge, or the consequences that ensue from their morally inappropriate behavior.

Situated Social Identities Constrain Morally Defensible Choices: Commentary on Bennis, Medin, & Bartels (2010)

  • P. TetlockG. Mitchell
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2010
It is argued that the overriding goal of most decision makers in the paradigms under scrutiny is to offer judgments that are readily defensible and that reinforce their social identities as both cognitively flexible and morally principled.

Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making

Moral dilemmas and moral rules

Who Shalt Not Kill? Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment

People with higher WMC found certain types of killing more appropriate than did those with lower WMC and were more consistent in their judgments, and interactions between manipulated variables that implicate complex emotion-cognition integration processes not captured by current dual-process views of moral judgment are reported.

An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment.

Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more?

Results supported the moral mandate hypothesis: Stronger moral conviction led to greater preferred social and physical distance from attitudinally dissimilar others, and a greater inability to generate procedural solutions to resolve disagreements.

Utilitarianism and Beyond

Preface Introduction: utilitarianism and beyond Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams 1. Ethical theory and utilitarianism R. M. Hare 2. Morality and the theory of rational behaviour John C. Harsanyi 3.