The malpractice of “rationality” in international relations

  title={The malpractice of “rationality” in international relations},
  author={Uriel Abulof},
  journal={Rationality and Society},
  pages={358 - 384}
  • Uriel Abulof
  • Published 2015
  • Sociology
  • Rationality and Society
  • This article investigates the misuse of “rationality” in academic and political discourses, focusing on the Iranian nuclear project. The concept of rationality is ubiquitous; scholars, pundits, and practitioners turn to it, sometimes unwittingly, to describe, explain, and predict. When concerning concrete security and foreign policies, however, this praxis borders on malpractice: rationality-based descriptions are largely either false or unfalsifiable; many observers fail to explicate the… CONTINUE READING
    3 Citations

    Tables from this paper.

    Paradox as a generative practice
    Introduction: the politics of public justification
    • 6
    Evidence Based Medicine - A Critical Analysis
    • 1
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF


    Assessing Iran's Nuclear Rationality: The “Eye of the Beholder” Problem
    • 13
    Revisiting Iran’s nuclear rationales
    • 7
    Rationality, Allocation, and Reproduction
    • V. Walsh
    • Economics, Political Science
    • 1996
    • 64
    • PDF
    Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making
    • 64
    The Logic Behind Iran's Uncompromising Nuclear Policy
    • 4
    Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-first Century
    • 208
    • PDF
    The Paradox of Iran's Nuclear Consensus
    • 17
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Nuclear Diversion Theory and Legitimacy Crisis: The Case of Iran
    • 6
    The state as person in international theory
    • 332
    The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis
    • 365
    • PDF