The lasting effect of words on feelings: words may facilitate exposure effects to threatening images.

  title={The lasting effect of words on feelings: words may facilitate exposure effects to threatening images.},
  author={Golnaz Tabibnia and Matthew D. Lieberman and Michelle G. Craske},
  volume={8 3},
Previous studies have shown that mere words, particularly affective words, can dampen emotional responses. However, the effect of affective labels on emotional responding in the long term is unknown. The authors examined whether repeated exposure to aversive images would lead to more reduction in autonomic reactivity a week later if the images were exposed with single-word labels than without labels. In Experiment 1, healthy individuals were exposed to pictures of disturbing scenes with or… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Feelings Into Words
In a real-world clinical context, spider-fearful individuals were repeatedly exposed to a live spider and the effects of affect labeling, reappraisal, distraction from the feared stimulus, and exposure alone during this brief course of exposure therapy on subsequent fear responding were compared.
Subjective Responses to Emotional Stimuli During Labeling, Reappraisal, and Distraction
The effect of affect labeling on self-reported emotional experience suggests that affect labeling tends to dampen affective responses in general, rather than specifically alleviating negative affect.
Can words heal? Using affect labeling to reduce the effects of unpleasant cues on symptom reporting
The findings suggest that using an emotion regulation strategy, such as labeling emotional stimuli, can reverse the effects of unpleasant stimuli on symptom reporting and that such strategies can be especially beneficial for individuals suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms.
The effects of verbal labelling on psychophysiology: Objective but not subjective emotion labelling reduces skin-conductance responses to briefly presented pictures
The results indicate that only objective labelling results in decreased emotional responding, and describe a novel interaction between bottom-up stimulus characteristics and top-down cognitive effects on physiological responses.
When does Inhibition of Affect Labeling Occur: ERP Study
Affect labeling refers to the processing of emotional stimuli, with words describing the stimuli. Many studies using fMRI have found that affect reactions are weakened when they are being tested in
The impact of affect labelling on responses to aversive flying-cues
This is the first study to indicate affect labelling may help to regulate aspects of cue-reactive anxiety in response to aversive flying stimuli.
The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults
Together these results point to common neurocognitive mechanisms involved in affect labeling and reappraisal, supporting the idea that intentional and incidental emotion regulation may utilize overlapping neural processes.
Incidental Emotion Regulation Deficits in Public Speaking Anxiety
Affect labeling (putting feelings into words) decreases subjective emotional distress and is a form of incidental or unintentional emotion regulation. Anxiety is associated with deficits in explicit
Affect labeling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speaking anxiety.


Putting Feelings Into Words
The results suggest that affect labeling may diminish emotional reactivity along a pathway from RVLPFC to MPFC to the amygdala, which is mediated by activity in medial prefrontal cortex.
Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information.
Mechanisms that govern the processing of emotional information, particularly those involved in fear reduction, are proposed and applications to therapeutic practice and to the broader study of psychopathology are discussed.
Glucocorticoids reduce phobic fear in humans.
The present findings in two distinct types of phobias indicate that glucocorticoid administration reduces phobic fear.
Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions.
Responsibility specificity, particularly facial expressiveness, supported the view that specific affects have unique patterns of reactivity, and consistency of the dimensional relationships between evaluative judgments and physiological response emphasizes that emotion is fundamentally organized by these motivational parameters.
Rethinking Feelings: An fMRI Study of the Cognitive Regulation of Emotion
Functional magnetic resonance imaging findings support the hypothesis that prefrontal cortex is involved in constructing reappraisal strategies that can modulate activity in multiple emotion-processing systems.
Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system
Functional MRI results provide evidence for a network in which higher regions attenuate emotional responses at the most fundamental levels in the brain and suggest a neural basis for modulating emotional experience through interpretation and labeling.
Neural Correlates of Conscious Self-Regulation of Emotion
Findings reinforce the view that emotional self-regulation is normally implemented by a neural circuit comprising various prefrontal regions and subcortical limbic structures and suggest that humans have the capacity to influence the electrochemical dynamics of their brains, by voluntarily changing the nature of the mind processes unfolding in the psychological space.
Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.
  • J. Gross
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1998
Reappraisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression increased sympathetic activation, suggesting that these 2 emotion regulatory processes may have different adaptive consequences.
Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli
Extending animal models of fear conditioning to humans