The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis

@article{Mongeon2015TheJC,
  title={The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis},
  author={Philippe Mongeon and Ad{\`e}le Paul-Hus},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2015},
  volume={106},
  pages={213-228}
}
  • Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus
  • Published 2015
  • Computer Science
  • Scientometrics
  • Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. [...] Key Result As a consequence, the results of bibliometric analyses may vary depending on the database used. These results imply that in the context of comparative research evaluation, WoS and Scopus should be used with caution, especially when comparing different fields, institutions, countries or languages.Expand Abstract

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science
    • 25
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
    • 12
    • PDF
    The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university
    • 51
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
    • 6
    Dimensions: A Competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?
    • 44
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES
    Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study
    • 155
    Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases
    • 297
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus
    • 117
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences
    • 211