• DOI:10.1677/ERC.0.0110085
• Corpus ID: 147646

The interaction of oestrogen receptor status and pathological features with adjuvant treatment in relation to survival in patients with operable breast cancer: a retrospective study of 2660 patients.

@article{Barnes2004TheIO,
  title={The interaction of oestrogen receptor status and pathological features with adjuvant treatment in relation to survival in patients with operable breast cancer: a retrospective study of 2660 patients.},
  author={Diana M. Barnes and R. R. Millis and Cheryl Gillett and Kenneth Ryder and D Skilton and Ian S. Fentiman and Robert D. Rubens},
  journal={Endocrine-related cancer},
  year={2004},
  volume={11 1},
  pages={
          85-96
        }
}

• D. Barnes, R. Millis, +4 authors R. Rubens
• Published 1 March 2004
• Medicine
• Endocrine-related cancer

The oestrogen receptor (ER) status of 2660 patients with primary breast cancer has been related to the effect of different adjuvant systemic therapies on survival. However, as patients in the various treatment groups also had different prognostic features comparison between treatments was difficult. Over 90% of patients receiving tamoxifen (Tam) were postmenopausal compared with <20% of those receiving chemotherapy (CT). The latter had more positive nodes (85% vs 54%) and grade III tumours (54% vs 30%) than the Tam group. The combined CT and Tam group had similar characteristics to the CT alone group. The current reported increase in the proportion of women with ER+ tumours is explained by immunohistochemical analysis of ER and screening programmes. ER status was unrelated to survival in patients with small, low grade, node-negative tumours which was no different from that expected for age-matched women taken from the general population. The value of adjuvant treatment in these patients is therefore questionable. In those given any adjuvant treatment, survival of women with ER+ tumours was prolonged, with the greatest effect being seen in those receiving Tam. Patients with ER- tumours benefited from CT but the addition of Tam to CT improved survival only in those with ER+ tumours. ER status is now established as a major predictive factor for treatment selection in primary disease. Studies of prognostic and predictive markers may be invalidated by use of adjuvant therapy and selection criteria for different treatments. Survival will be influenced by both tumour biology and therapy. This important consideration must be remembered when analysing new markers, particularly in small studies.