The incarnation and the knowability paradox

@article{Kvanvig2009TheIA,
  title={The incarnation and the knowability paradox},
  author={Jonathan L. Kvanvig},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2009},
  volume={173},
  pages={89-105}
}
The best defense of the doctrine of the Incarnation implies that traditional Christianity has a special stake in the knowability paradox, a stake not shared by other theistic perspectives or by non-traditional accounts of the Incarnation. Perhaps, this stake is not even shared by antirealism, the view most obviously threatened by the paradox. I argue for these points, concluding that these results put traditional Christianity at a disadvantage compared to other viewpoints, and I close with some… CONTINUE READING

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Analogues of knowability

  • D. DeVide, T. Kenyon
  • Australasian Journal of Philoso
  • 2003

Knowability and epistemic truth

  • M. Hand
  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
  • 2003
2 Excerpts

Victor vanquished

  • N. Tennant
  • Analysis
  • 2002

The paradox of knowability

  • M. 481–495. Dummett
  • Victor’s error. Analysis,
  • 2001
2 Excerpts

Tennant on knowable truth

  • T. Williamson
  • Ratio
  • 2000
1 Excerpt

Tennant on knowability

  • M. Hand, J. L. Kvanvig
  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1999
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…