The impossibility of moral responsibility

  title={The impossibility of moral responsibility},
  author={Galen Strawson},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  • G. Strawson
  • Published 1994
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
Selon l'argument principal de l'A., nous ne pouvons pas reellement etre moralement responsables de nos actions. De plus, nous ne pouvons pas changer notre maniere de devenir moralement responsables 

The explanatory component of moral responsibility

In this paper, we do three things. First, we put forth a novel hypothesis about judgments of moral responsibility according to which such judgments are a species of explanatory judgments. Second, w

On the Possibility of Rational Free Action

L'A. rejette la these de G. Strawson selon laquelle il est impossible pour un agent d'agir librement et rationnellement, parce qu'il est impossible pour un humain d'etre strictement causa sui.

Consequentialism and Free Will: The Conditional Analysis Resuscitated

Many moral theories incorporate the idea that when an action is wrong, it is wrong because there was something else that the agent could and should have done instead. Most notable among these are c

Collective explanations, joint responsibility

Two philosophical discussions of moral responsibility run parallel. One is tightly connected to the debate about free will and its relation to determinism and indeterminism. Philosophical accounts ...

The Metaphysics of Relational Autonomy

I here focus on two debates about the conditions for self-governance. In one, the metaphysical debate, theorists are concerned with the potential threat that causal determinism poses to

¿Es posible ser moralmente responsable? Notas para una nueva definición del concepto de sujeto

The Strawson´s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody

Two Arguments for Impossiblism and Why It isn’t Impossible to Refute them

This paper examines two arguments against the possibility of moral responsibility—the first directly from the work of Galen Strawson and the next inspired by Strawson’s argument. Both of these

Moral Responsibility and “Moral Luck”

This paper has two purposes. The first (part 1) is to defend a distinctive account of moral responsibility; the second (part 2), to argue that "moral luck," understood as a susceptibility of moral

Dealing with the past: responsibility and personal history

I argue that unfortunate formative circumstances do not undermine the warrant for either responsibility or blame. I then diagnose the tendency to think that formative circumstances do matter in this

Omissions, Moral Luck, and Minding the (Epistemic) Gap

  • Joseph Metz
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  • 2021
Abstract This paper warns of two threats to moral responsibility that arise when accounting for omissions, given some plausible assumptions about how abilities are related to responsibility. The



Existentialism and humanism

Originally delivered as a lecture in Paris in 1945, 'Existentialism and Humanism' is Sartre's seminal defence of his original doctrine of existentialism and a plan for its practical application to

The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism

I sometimes act morally, doing what I think I morally ought to do. If hard determinism is the correct position with respect to the free will problem, I am not morally responsible for such acts, I am

Freedom and Belief

Introduction PART I: METAPHYSICS AND COMMITMENT: Libertarianism, action, and self-determination Kant and commitment Commitment, illusion, and truth Non-rational commitment: a view of freedom

Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology

Translator's preface, Introduction, The Pursuit of Being, Part 1. The Problem of Nothingness, Part 2. Being-For-Itself, Part 3. Being-For-Others, Part 4. Having, Doing and Being, Conclusion, Key to

The Critique of Practical Reason

This work is called the Critique of Practical Reason, not of the pure practical reason, although its parallelism with the speculative critique would seem to require the latter term. The reason of

What Is History

  • S. Itzkoff
  • History
    History of Education Quarterly
  • 1962
Introduction to the 40th Anniversary Edition R.J.Evans Introductory Note Preface to Second Edition The Historian and His Facts Society and the Individual History, Science and Morality Causation in


There is, it seems to me, something that might be called an "orthodox" or "classical" tradition in the history of thinking about the problem of free will and determinism. This tradition, as I see it,


Two Kinds of Incompatibilism