The impact of review articles

  title={The impact of review articles},
  author={Catherine M. Ketcham and James M. Crawford},
  journal={Laboratory Investigation},
The expansion of the scientific literature has produced a concomitant increase in the number of review articles. One may posit that the sheer number of review articles belies their function. This study examines the growth of the review literature, what types of journals publish these papers, and provides data on the citation rate of the review literature. Focus is given to the pathology literature, defined as papers that have the word ‘pathology’ or its derivatives in the title, abstract or as… 

Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda

The purpose of this paper is to review recent developments for the study of review articles in scientometrics and beyond, to discuss theoretical, conceptual and empirical accounts of how review articles can be defined, and to identify major methodological and conceptual challenges for studying review articles.

Review Citation Factors

Reviews are essential for the sustainable development of research, as evidenced by their higher citation rates compared to other types of publications. The literature on the typification of reviews

Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.

The aim of this review is to go into the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing, that is the peer review process and the journal impact factors, which are thought to be more quantitative and objective indicators, directly related to published science.

Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews

Why literature reviews are valued by their diverse readership and how peer reviewers with different levels of content expertise can improve the reliability and accessibility of narrative review articles are summarized.

Impact factor and its role in academic promotion

The impact factor calculated for individual journals should not be used as a basis for evaluating the significance of an individual scientist’s past performance or scientific potential, according to editors of international peer-reviewed journals.

A 30-Year Citation Analysis of Bibliometric Trends at the Archives of Environmental Health, 1975–2004

  • Derek R. Smith
  • History, Psychology
    Archives of environmental & occupational health
  • 2009
It is demonstrated that citation analysis can provide an interesting look at the development of a journal over time, and offers a unique insight into the direction of not only a particular journal, but also the discipline within which it exists.

The proper use of citation data in journal management

The editors of Laboratory Investigation have found that weekly tracking of citation data for this and other highly ranked pathology journals provides valuable feedback on editorial performance and enables them to predict accurate IFs at least six months in advance.



Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature.

The effects of the rapidly expanding literature on the impact factor over the past decade is examined and the limitations of journal impact factor for evaluating individual author's contributions are examined.

Predicting impact factor one year in advance

Through weekly collection of citation data from the Web of Science® over the past 2 years, it is demonstrated that the evolution of IF can be tracked weekly over the course of a calendar year, enabling prediction of the next year's IF beginning at the middle of the previous year.

Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.

  • B. Squires
  • Medicine
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
  • 1989
The abstract The abstract of a review article is no less important than the abstract of an original research article. The readers should be informed of the authors' reasons for reviewing the topic,

Literary Genres and the Construction of Knowledge in Biology: Semantic Shifts and Scientific Change

Experimental papers (`primary literature') in biology are generally considered as the key scientific texts that allow the construction of knowledge claims, whereas it is held that review papers

Mining the bibliome: searching for a needle in a haystack?

The increasingly wider application of data‐intensive technologies, such as DNA and protein chips, high‐throughput protein three‐dimensional structure determination and real‐time molecular and cellular imaging, have confirmed fears that biologists are likely to be swamped by a digital tsunami of data.

Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow's information architecture

The changing roles of scholarly journals and databases are examined, the vision of the optimal information architecture for the biosciences is presented, and tangible steps to improve the handling of scientific information today while paving the way for an expansive central index in the future are closed.

Propagation of Errors in Review Articles

This chapter discusses sham publication in the secondary literature, which is important because scientists rely on the authors of reviews to gather and analyze the unwieldy literature.

Impact factor: certainly a factor, but just whom does it impact? Important lessons from another discipline

  • B. Smoller
  • History, Art
    Journal of cutaneous pathology
  • 2006
In the second half of the eighteenth century, Mozart and Hadyn ruled the world of classical music and are revered as geniuses even today, above many of their contemporaries, for the daring innovations that they brought to the field of concert music.

The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less

Whether we're buying a pair of jeans, ordering a cup of coffee, selecting a long-distance carrier, applying to college, choosing a doctor, or setting up a 401(k), everyday decisions-both big and