The impact of procedural priming of selective accessibility on self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors

@article{Chaxel2014TheIO,
  title={The impact of procedural priming of selective accessibility on self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors},
  author={Anne-sophie Chaxel},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year={2014},
  volume={50},
  pages={45-51}
}
Abstract Anchoring is often considered to be the product of two distinct processes: (a) the under-adjustment associated with the anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic, when individuals provide their own anchors; and (b) selective accessibility, when an experiment provides an anchor. The evidence for the existence of two distinct processes mostly comes from the differential impact of effort across anchor types (self-generated vs. experimenter-provided). The present work challenges this distinction… Expand
Failures to replicate a key result of the selective accessibility theory of anchoring.
Anchoring: accessibility as a cause of judgmental assimilation
Anchoring in Numeric Judgments of Visual Stimuli
The anchoring-bias in groups
Similarity Focus and Support for Redistribution
Prior Predictions Influence Social Preferences
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
The malleability of anchoring effects.
Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.
  • Chapman, Johnson
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Organizational behavior and human decision processes
  • 1999
Are Adjustments Insufficient?
...
1
2
3
4
...