The "impact factor" revisited

Abstract

The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use.

Extracted Key Phrases

0200400'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

1,206 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,206 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Dong2005TheF, title={The "impact factor" revisited}, author={Peng Dong and Marie Loh and Adrian Mondry}, journal={Biomedical Digital Libraries}, year={2005}, volume={2}, pages={7 - 7} }