The hitchhiker's guide to altruism: gene-culture coevolution, and the internalization of norms.

  title={The hitchhiker's guide to altruism: gene-culture coevolution, and the internalization of norms.},
  author={Herbert Gintis},
  journal={Journal of theoretical biology},
  volume={220 4},
  • H. Gintis
  • Published 2003
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of theoretical biology
An internal norm is a pattern of behavior enforced in part by internal sanctions, such as shame, guilt and loss of self-esteem, as opposed to purely external sanctions, such as material rewards and punishment. The ability to internalize norms is widespread among humans, although in some so-called "sociopaths", this capacity is diminished or lacking. Suppose there is one genetic locus that controls the capacity to internalize norms. This model shows that if an internal norm is fitness enhancing… Expand

Paper Mentions

The genetic side of gene-culture coevolution: internalization of norms and prosocial emotions
Joseph Henrich’s “Cultural Group Selection, Coevolutionary Processes and Large-scale Cooperation” is an insightful exposition of a very important research agenta in the theory of human cooperation,Expand
Questioning the cultural evolution of altruism
It is argued that cultural transmission yields altruism only to the extent that it relies on maladaptive mechanisms, such as conformist imitation and (in some cases) payoff‐biased transmission. Expand
Internalizing Cooperative Norms in Group-Structured Populations
Social norms play a crucial role in human behavior, especially in maintaining cooperation within human social groups. Social norms might be self-enforcing or be enforced by the threat of punishment.Expand
Internalizing cooperative norms in group-structured populations
A model for how intrinsic preferences to adhere to cooperative norms can evolve with and without external enforcement of compliance is presented, using the methodology of preference evolution to model how cooperative norms coevolve with the intrinsic motivations to follow them. Expand
Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization
Significance People often ignore material costs they incur when following existing social norms. Some individuals and groups are often willing to pay extremely high costs to enact, defend, orExpand
Explaining altruistic behavior in humans
Recent experimental research has revealed forms of human behavior involving interaction among unrelated individuals that have proven difficult to explain in terms of kin or reciprocal altruism. OneExpand
Is Cooperation a Maladaptive By-product of Social Learning? The Docility Hypothesis Reconsidered
The docility hypothesis holds that human social learning produces genuinely altruistic behaviors as a maladaptive by-product. This article examines five possible sources of such altruistic mistakes.Expand
Kinship, Cooperation, and the Evolution of Moral Systems
Across the social sciences, a key question is how societies manage to enforce cooperative behavior in social dilemmas such as public goods provision or bilateral trade. According to an influentialExpand
Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory
What explains variability in norms of cooperation across organizations and cultures? One answer comes from the tendency of individuals to internalize typically successful behaviors as norms.Expand
Human Altruism – Proximate Patterns and Evolutionary Origins
Abstract Are people selfish or altruistic? Throughout history this question has been answered on the basis of much introspection and little evidence. It has been at the heart of many controversialExpand


A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism.
A simple and robust mechanism, based on human docility and bounded rationality, is proposed that can account for the evolutionary success of genuinely altruistic behavior. Expand
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
  • R. Trivers
  • Psychology
  • The Quarterly Review of Biology
  • 1971
A model is presented to account for the natural selection of what is termed reciprocally altruistic behavior. The model shows how selection can operate against the cheater (non-reciprocator) in theExpand
Altruistic punishment in humans
It is shown experimentally that the altruistic punishment of defectors is a key motive for the explanation of cooperation, and that future study of the evolution of human cooperation should include a strong focus on explaining altruistic punished. Expand
Solving the Puzzle of Prosociality
Homo sapiens is the only species in which we observe extensive cooperation among large numbers of genetically unrelated individuals. Incompatible approaches to explaining cooperation among humansExpand
Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
It is proposed that the emergence of indirect reciprocity was a decisive step for the evolution of human societies and the probability of knowing the ‘image’ of the recipient must exceed the cost-to-benefit ratio of the altruistic act. Expand
Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity
Charles Darwin's On the Origins of Species had two principal goals: to show that species had not been separately created and to show that natural selection had been the main force behind theirExpand
Toward a theory for the evolution of cultural communication: coevolution of signal transmission and reception.
  • K. Aoki, M. Feldman
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1987
A haploid sexual two-locus model of gene-culture coevolution is examined, in which a dichotomous phenotype subject to natural selection is transmitted vertically with probabilities dependent on theExpand
Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity
The question of cooperation is crucial for understanding Darwinian evolution. Theories of cooperation have been based on kin selection, group selection, and reciprocal altruism. The idea ofExpand
The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model
Sociopaths are “outstanding” members of society in two senses: politically, they draw our attention because of the inordinate amount of crime they commit, and psychologically, they hold ourExpand
Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups
Abstract Existing models suggest that reciprocity is unlikely to evolve in large groups as a result of natural selection. In these models, reciprocators punish noncooperation by with-holding futureExpand