The guardian of the regime: the Turkish Constitutional Court in comparative perspective

@inproceedings{Shambayati2008TheGO,
  title={The guardian of the regime: the Turkish Constitutional Court in comparative perspective},
  author={Hootan Shambayati},
  year={2008}
}
review, most cases are brought before the Constitutional Court by the parliamentary opposition, a practice that increases the potential for the judicialisation of the political process.30 The frequency with which the opposition has used this strategy led one president of the Court to complain that the Constitutional Court had become ‘like a senate’.31 This, however, has not stopped the Court from using its powers to strike down parliamentary acts and governmental decrees. As Table 5.1 shows… 

Tables from this paper

Judicial review and social construction: the case of the Turkish Constitutional Court
The Turkish Constitutional Court is often described as an agent of the raison d’etat. Although a number of judgements confirm this assessment, by shifting the focus from result to process the article
Judicial “empowerment” through constitutional change: the case of Chilean and Turkish Constitutional Courts
Adopting a historical institutionalist approach, this article examines judicial empowerment through constitutional change in a comparative study of Chile and Turkey. It identifies the historical
Democratic constitution-making and unfreezing the Turkish process
This short article will seek to explore the causes, and possible solutions, of what seems to be the current freezing of the Turkish constitution-making process that has had some dramatic successes in
The Democratic Legitimacy of Strong Constitutional Entrenchment : The Cases of Turkey and India
Judicial review and constitutional entrenchment are often held to be illegitimate from the point of view of democratic theory (Waldron 2006; Bellamy 2007). This worry, it would appear, must intensify
The Hegemonic Preservation Thesis Revisited: The Example of Turkey
This paper offers a critical rereading of the history of judicial review of constitutional amendments in Turkey. We argue that, contrary to appearances, the claim to a power of amendment review on
Courts and New Democracies: Recent Works
Recent literature on comparative judicial politics reveals a variety of roles that courts adopt in the process of democratization. These include, very rarely, serving as a trigger for democratization
Rule by law : the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes
1. Introduction Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa 2. Of judges and generals: security courts under authoritarian regimes in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile Anthony Pereira 3. Administrative law and
Semi-Official Turkish Muslim Legal Pluralism: Encounters between Secular Official Law and Unofficial Shari’a
This study provides an account of the current secular Turkish Civil Code, with special focus on family law issues such as consent, age of marriage, registration of marriage, status of religious
Judges Discover Politics: Sources of Judges’ Off-Bench Mobilization in Turkey
When do judges initiate public action outside the courtroom? What kinds of political activities do they engage in? What are the consequences of their interactions with social and political actors?
...
...