The giant cryptic amphipod species of the subterranean genus Niphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda)

@article{Deli2017TheGC,
  title={The giant cryptic amphipod species of the subterranean genus Niphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda)},
  author={Teo Deli{\'c} and Vid {\vS}vara and Charles Oliver Coleman and Peter Trontelj and Cene Fi{\vs}er},
  journal={Zoologica Scripta},
  year={2017},
  volume={46},
  pages={740 - 752}
}
Amphipods from the genus Niphargus represent an important part of the Western Palearctic subterranean fauna. The genus is morphologically diverse, comprising several distinct ecomorphs bound to microhabitats in the subterranean environment. The most impressive among them are “lake giants,” a series of massive, large‐bodied species. These range from morphologically distinct to morphologically cryptic taxa. We analysed the taxonomic structure of the Niphargus arbiter–Niphargus salonitanus species… 
Distribution pattern and radiation of the European subterranean genus Verhoeffiella (Collembola, Entomobryidae)
TLDR
The combination of this extensive subterranean radiation and close evolutionary links with epigean relatives makes Verhoeffiella an exceptional case within the subterranean fauna of temperate areas, which significantly contributes to the authors' understanding of subterranean colonization and diversification patterns.
Molecular and taxonomic analyses in troglobiotic Alpioniscus (Illyrionethes) species from the Dinaric Karst (Isopoda: Trichoniscidae)
TLDR
A detailed morphological analysis was performed to distinguish and characterize the species of the strasseri-lineage, which was highly supported by all phylogenetic methods used; therefore, 15 nominal species of Illyrionethes are currently known from the Dinaric Karst.
Phylogenetic relationships of Sphaeromides Dollfus, 1897 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cirolanidae) and some related taxa, with new considerations about Trogloaega Brian, 1923
TLDR
The results contribute to the awareness that the isopod morphology is characterised by high level of homoplasy and molecular phylogenetic analyses are essential in identifying taxonomic units.
Range sizes of groundwater amphipods (Crustacea) are not smaller than range sizes of surface amphipods: a case study from Iran
TLDR
There is no evidence to consider that groundwater species are geographically more restricted than surface species, and the range sizes of surface and groundwater species might be more similar in size than hitherto thought.
How did subterranean amphipods cross the Adria c Sea? Phylogene c evidence for the dispersal- vicariance interplay mediated by marine regression-transgression cycles Running tle: Biogeography of transadria c niphargids
Aim: We tested the hypothesis that historical marine regression-transgression cycles shaped the distribu+on paKerns of subterranean amphipods through repeated cycles of dispersal and vicariance
Addressing the Linnean shortfall in a cryptic species complex
TLDR
The general lineage concept of species is applied to an amphipod species complex that occupies springs of the northern Chihuahuan Desert, showing that each spring contains a genetically distinct population that is geographically isolated from other springs, suggesting evolutionary independence and status as separate species.
FURTHER DISCOVERY OF NEW OR PARTIALLY KNOWN TAXA OF THE GENUS NIPHARGUS SCHIODTE, 1849 (FAM. NIPHARGIDAE) IN GREECE (CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE AMPHIPODA 302)
TLDR
The new subterranean subspecies of the genus Niphargus Schiödte, 1849, described and known based on single specimen from Attica region of Greece only, is established in Thessaly region also, and new taxonomical data of this species from both localities are presented.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 108 REFERENCES
Molecular phylogeny of the subterranean genus Niphargus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Middle East: a comparison with European Niphargids
TLDR
Revision of qualitative morphological traits and unilocus species delimitation methods using COI suggest that this clade comprises 12–16 species, of which only three have been described so far, andMultilocus coalescence delimiting methods strongly supported 11 of these species.
Phylogenetic analysis of the Niphargus orcinus species–aggregate (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) with description of new taxa
TLDR
This study examined cladistically the phylogeny of the Niphargus orcinus aggregate, a widely distributed assemblage of large‐bodied amphipods that comprises the most prominent European groundwater animals, and demonstrated that “Orniphargos” does not constitute a monophylum.
A phylogenetic perspective on 160 years of troubled taxonomy of Niphargus (Crustacea: Amphipoda)
TLDR
This study is the first comprehensive phylogenetic treatment of the chiefly subterranean group in 160 years of its taxonomic history, providing a framework for future studies on niphargid systematics, the evolution of endemism and cryptic diversity in subterranean environments, the mechanisms leading to exceptional morphological heterogeneity, historical biogeography, and applied ecological issues.
The southwestern Carpathians as an ancient centre of diversity of freshwater gammarid amphipods: insights from the Gammarus fossarum species complex
TLDR
It is concluded that subsidence could have been an important driver of diversification in freshwater Gammarus and that the southwestern Carpathians represent an ancient centre of diversity for these crustaceans.
The importance of naming cryptic species and the conservation of endemic subterranean amphipods
TLDR
The South European cryptic complex of the subterranean amphipod Niphargus stygius sensu lato is scrutinized, showing that it consists of 15 parapatric and sympatric species, which are described using molecular diagnoses and are as evolutionarily distinct as average nominal species of the same genus.
Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda; Crustacea) in freshwater
TLDR
Freshwater amphipods are greatly polyphyletic, continental invasions have taken place repeatedly in different time frames and regions of the world, and have had great impacts on European fluvial ecosystems.
Can Environment Predict Cryptic Diversity? The Case of Niphargus Inhabiting Western Carpathian Groundwater
TLDR
The results showed that the studied populations belong to eight different species that derive from two phylogenetically unrelated Niphargus clades, and narrow endemic species in fact comprise complexes of morphologically similar species that are indistinguishable without using a molecular approach.
Species, ESUs or populations? Delimiting and describing morphologically cryptic diversity in Australian desert spring amphipods
TLDR
It is concluded that Wangiannachiltonia guzikae King, 2009, as currently circumscribed, represents six genetically distinct amphipod species, and all of these newly recognised species have extremely limited distributions, which increases the biodiversity significance of their desert spring habitat.
Drastic underestimation of amphipod biodiversity in the endangered Irano-Anatolian and Caucasus biodiversity hotspots
TLDR
Molecular species delimitation methods are used to quantify cryptic diversity of the montane amphipods in the Irano-Anatolian and Caucasus biodiversity hotspots and demonstrate that Amphipod biodiversity is drastically underestimated.
A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts?
TLDR
Data suggest that small ranges of macro-stygobionts are the rule, and ranges over 200 km are extremely rare, and a considerable increase in overall diversity at the regional and continental scale and a strong decrease in faunal similarities among regions, coupled with greater endemism.
...
...