The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns

  title={The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns},
  author={Craig R. Brunetti and Jayne E Selegue and Ant{\'o}nia Monteiro and Vernon French and Paul M. Brakefield and Sean B. Carroll},
  journal={Current Biology},

Figures from this paper

Mutants highlight the modular control of butterfly eyespot patterns
Several developmental models are proposed, based on wing compartmentalization in Drosophila, that provide the first framework for thinking about the molecular evolution of butterfly wing pattern modularity.
Anterior–Posterior Patterning in Lepidopteran Wings
A hitherto unrecognized mode of evolution of patterning in the Lepidoptera is revealed by surveying the frequency of color boundaries, tail development, and wing shape discontinuities across five major butterfly families: Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, and Riodinidae.
Color-Pattern Analysis of Eyespots in Butterfly Wings: A Critical Examination of Morphogen Gradient Models
  • J. Otaki
  • Environmental Science
    Zoological science
  • 2011
Results indicate that each eyespot ring has independence and flexibility to a certain degree, which is less consistent with the single-morphogen model.
Comparative insights into questions of lepidopteran wing pattern homology
Wingless and TGF-β ligands are both candidate morphogens involved in nymphalid butterfly eyespot formation and commonality suggests that they may be produced via the same developmental mechanism despite their non-homologous location.
Conserved roles of Distal-less and spalt in regulating butterfly melanic patterns
It is concluded that both Dll and sal share a conserved role in promoting scale melanisation, across pierid and nymphalid butterflies, but are unlikely to be involved in differentiating spot centers.
Generation of Butterfly Wing Eyespot Patterns: A Model for Morphological Determination of Eyespot and Parafocal Element
It is proposed that eyespots are fundamentally composed of dark rings and non-dark “background” spaces between them, and PFEs constitute a periodic continuum of eyespot dark rings; thus, a background space between the eyespot and a PFE is mechanistically equivalent to eyespot light rings.
Distal-less induces elemental color patterns in Junonia butterfly wings
It is shown that ectopically expressed Dll induces ectopic elemental color patterns in the adult wings of the blue pansy butterfly, Junonia orithya, and suggests that Dll plays an instructive role in the development of color pattern elements in butterfly wings, although Dll alone may not be sufficient to induce a complete eyespot.
Developmental and genetic mechanisms for evolutionary diversification of serial repeats: eyespot size in Bicyclus anynana butterflies.
This work uses micromanipulations of developing wings to dissect the contribution of different components of eyespot development to quantitative differences in eyespot size on one wing surface, and reports on the phenotypic analysis of a number of mutant stocks demonstrating how single alleles can affect different eyespots in concert or independently, and thus contribute to the individualization of serially repeated traits.
A release from developmental bias accelerates morphological diversification in butterfly eyespots
It is shown that development can bias the evolutionary independence of traits, but it also shows how bias can be released through developmental innovations, thus, allowing rapid morphological change, facilitating evolutionary diversification.
Conserved developmental processes and the formation of evolutionary novelties: examples from butterfly wings
It is discussed how eyespot mutants with disturbed embryonic development may help elucidate the genetic pathways involved in eyespot formation, and how venation mutants with altered eyespot patterns might shed light on mechanisms of eyespot development.


The butterfly Bicyclus anynana has a series of distal eyespots on its wings. Each eyespot is composed of a white pupil, a black disc, and a gold outer ring. We applied artificial selection to the
Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the epidermal response to damage.
It is shown that ectopic eyespots can be induced in nonfocal positions throughout the distal, but not the proximal, wing epidermis of Bicyclus anynana by mild epidermal damage inflicted at 12-18 hr (into a 6- to 7-day pupal period).
Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings.
Eyespots, which form from discrete developmental organizers, are marked by Distal-less gene expression, and appear to be generated by a process similar to, and perhaps evolved from, proximodistal pattern formation in insect appendages.
Butterfly wing patterns: how good a determining mechanism is the simple diffusion of a single morphogen?
Quantitative analysis of the pattern-forming process shows that, with a biologically realistic diffusion constant and a morphogen half life less than 6h, the patterns form within approximately 12h over a wing of approximately 1000 cells in length.
Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution.
Redeployment of preexisting regulatory circuits may be a general mechanism underlying the evolution of novelties in butterflies.
Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns
Species comparisons and selection experiments suggest that the evolution of eyespot patterns can occur rapidly through modulation of different stages of this pathway, and requires only single, or very few, changes in regulatory genes.
Symmetry systems and compartments in Lepidopteran wings: the evolution of a patterning mechanism
Mapping of various pattern types onto a phylogeny of the Lepidoptera indicates that symmetry systems evolved in several steps from simple spotting patterns, which yielded an essentially mosaic developmental system of unprecedented permutational flexibility that enabled the great radiation of butterfly wing patterns.
Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the focal signal.
The results of several grafting experiments demonstrate that their different response properties are autonomous to small areas of the distal and proximal epidermis and that the nonresponding proximal tissue can nonetheless transmit the focal sign.