The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens

@article{Lieberman2002TheEA,
  title={The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens},
  author={Daniel E. Lieberman and Brandeis M McBratney and Gail Krovitz},
  journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  year={2002},
  volume={99},
  pages={1134 - 1139}
}
Despite much data, there is no unanimity over how to define Homo sapiens in the fossil record. Here, we examine cranial variation among Pleistocene and recent human fossils by using a model of cranial growth to identify unique derived features (autapomorphies) that reliably distinguish fossils attributed to “anatomically modern” H. sapiens (AMHS) from those attributed to various taxa of “archaic” Homo spp. (AH) and to test hypotheses about the changes in cranial development that underlie the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo
Interactions of the brain and cranium in archaic populations remain poorly understood. Hominin fossils from Middle Pleistocene localities in Africa and Europe have been allocated to one or more
Fossil evidence for the origin of Homo sapiens.
TLDR
A suite of features seems to characterize all H. sapiens alive today, and the fossil evidence is reviewed in light of those features, paying particular attention to the bipartite brow and the "chin" as examples of how, given the continuum from developmentally regulated genes to adult morphology, features preserved in fossil specimens in a comparative analysis that includes extant taxa are considered.
A Shared Pattern of Postnatal Endocranial Development in Extant Hominoids
TLDR
It is demonstrated that from late infancy to adulthood ontogenetic trajectories are similar among all hominoid species, but differ in the amount of shape change, and that during early ontogeny gorillas undergo more pronounced shape changes than do chimpanzees, indicative of a dissociation of size and shape change.
Craniofacial Evolution: From Australopithecus to Modern Man
TLDR
The aim of this article is to retrace the evolutionary steps that led to Homo Sapiens, the direct ancestor of modern man, and show that both trends have had an important impact on the morphology and function of the skull ofmodern man.
Testing hypotheses about tinkering in the fossil record: the case of the human skull.
TLDR
The results indicate that facial retraction in modern humans is largely a product of three derived changes: a relatively longer anterior cranial base, a more flexed Cranial base angle, and a relatively shorter upper face.
Evidence for expansion of the precuneus in human evolution
TLDR
Comparison of medial brain morphology between humans and chimpanzees and MRI-derived structural brain templates suggests that precuneus expansion is a neurological specialization of H. sapiens that evolved in the last 150,000 years that may be associated with recent human cognitive specializations.
Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: Evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages
TLDR
The origin of the authors' species may have represented the opportunity to surpass the constraints imposed on encephalization by the ontogenetic pattern shared by nonmodern Homo representatives, and two different evolutionary trajectories are identified.
Evolution of cranial and endocranial profiles in Homo species: A study in 2D geometric morphometrics
TLDR
This exploratory piece of research examines endo- and ectocranial profiles in samples representing 3 Homo taxa: Homo sapiens (fossil and recent specimens), Homo erectus, and Homo neanderthalensis, and used 2D geometric morphometrics to analyze the shape of the end-and-endocrâne vaults, as well as the relationships between selected anatomical features such as the extension of lobes and bones.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 66 REFERENCES
Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity
TLDR
Computerized fossil reconstruction and geometric morphometrics are used to show that characteristic differences in cranial and mandibular shape between Neanderthals and modern humans arose very early during development, possibly prenatally, and were maintained throughout postnatal ontogeny.
The ontogeny of cranial base angulation in humans and chimpanzees and its implications for reconstructing pharyngeal dimensions.
TLDR
Test the hypothesis that cranial base angulation influences pharyngeal dimensions and can, therefore, be used to estimate vocal tract proportions in fossil hominids and results indicate that internal and external Cranial base angles are independent of the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the vocal tract.
Cranial thickening in an Australian hominid as a possible palaeoepidemiological indicator.
  • S. Webb
  • Environmental Science
    American journal of physical anthropology
  • 1990
TLDR
It is tentatively suggested that the cranial thickening of the Australian hominid has its origins in some form of genetic blood disease and that if this diagnosis is correct, this individual provides a rare glimpse of human biological adaptation in the late Upper Pleistocene.
The human chin revisited: what is it and who has it?
TLDR
The essential features of symphyseal morphology in H. sapiens are pointed out, which are present and well-defined in the fetus at least as early as the fifth gestational month and serve to emphasize the importance of studying this region in juveniles whenever possible.
Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the northern Caucasus
TLDR
Phylogenetic analysis places the two Neanderthals from the Caucasus and western Germany together in a clade that is distinct from modern humans, suggesting that their mtDNA types have not contributed to the modern human mtDNA pool.
Anterior sphenoid in modern humans
TLDR
It turns out that the anterior sphenoid in modern humans is no shorter than in archaic Homo, and ASL was incorrectly estimated in those archaic fossil crania in which these landmarks are unambiguously preserved.
Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape.
TLDR
This study examines the extent to which the major dimensions of the cranial base (maximum length, maximum breadth, and flexion) interact with brain volume to influence major proportions of the neurocranium and face and highlights how integration between the Cranial base and the brain may help to account for the developmental basis of some morphological variations such as occipital bunning.
The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior.
TLDR
The African Middle and early Late Pleistocene hominid fossil record is fairly continuous and in it can be recognized a number of probably distinct species that provide plausible ancestors for H. sapiens, and suggests a gradual assembling of the package of modern human behaviors in Africa, and its later export to other regions of the Old World.
Posterior maxillary (PM) plane and anterior cranial architecture in primates
TLDR
The PM plane, anterior Cranial base, and anterior cranial floor form an integrated structural complex, a “facial block,” whose orientation relative to the posterior cranial base influences craniofacial shape among anthropoids in which orbital orientation influences the orientation of the anterior cranIAL base.
...
...