The end of military-techno Pax Americana? Washington’s strategic responses to Chinese AI-enabled military technology

@article{Johnson2019TheEO,
  title={The end of military-techno Pax Americana? Washington’s strategic responses to Chinese AI-enabled military technology},
  author={James Johnson},
  journal={The Pacific Review},
  year={2019},
  volume={34},
  pages={351 - 378}
}
  • James Johnson
  • Published 21 October 2019
  • Political Science
  • The Pacific Review
Abstract This article uses the international relations (IR) ‘polarity’ concept as a lens to view the shifting great power dynamics in artificial intelligence (AI) and related enabling technologies. The article describes how and why great power competition is mounting in within several interrelated dual-use technological fields; why these innovations are considered by Washington to be strategically vital, and how (and to what end) the United States is responding to the perceived challenge posed… 
Conclusion: China Cracks the Whip: The Geopolitical Economy of Chinese Externalisation
This chapter explicates how the structural dynamics of the state capitalist system of accumulation are shaping choices being made by China’s leaders across foreign, trade, and industrial policy
Artificial Intelligence: A Threat to Strategic Stability
AI-augmented conventional capabilities might affect strategic stability between great military powers. The nuanced, multifaceted possible intersections of this emerging technology with a range of
Delegating strategic decision-making to machines: Dr. Strangelove Redux?
  • J. Johnson
  • Political Science
    Journal of Strategic Studies
  • 2020
ABSTRACT Will the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic decision-making be stabilizing or destabilizing? What are the risks and trade-offs of pre-delegating military force to machines? How
The dual-use security dilemma and the social construction of insecurity
TLDR
It is suggested that enunciators shape the dynamics of the dual- use security dilemma by using specific rationales of insecurity to mobilize support for measures against opponents holding dual-use technologies, whose response further fuels insecurity that spirals over time.
The AI-cyber nexus: implications for military escalation, deterrence and strategic stability
How could AI-infused cyber capabilities be used to subvert, or otherwise compromise, the reliability, control and use of states’ nuclear forces? This article argues that a new generation of artific...
‘Catalytic nuclear war’ in the age of artificial intelligence & autonomy: Emerging military technology and escalation risk between nuclear-armed states
This article revisits the Cold War-era concept of ‘catalytic nuclear war,’ considered by many as unworkable, and reconceptualizes it in light of technological change, as well as improved understand...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 143 REFERENCES
United States Hegemony and the New Economics of Defense
Liberal theory asserts that the need for cost-effective, technologically advanced weapons requires the United States to acquiesce to increasing defense globalization even as this restrains U.S.
Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet: Military-Technological Superiority and the Limits of Imitation, Reverse Engineering, and Cyber Espionage
Can countries easily imitate the United States' advanced weapon systems and thus erode its military-technological superiority? Scholarship in international relations theory generally assumes that
Washington's perceptions and misperceptions of Beijing's anti-access area-denial (A2-AD) ‘strategy’: implications for military escalation control and strategic stability
ABSTRACT Washington has become increasingly concerned that Beijing's anti-access area-denial (A2-AD) capabilities will put at risk US military assets and forward forces operating in the Western
The diffusion of military power: causes and consequences for international politics
also means that this mismatch may eventually lead to an ‘expectations-capability gap’, reproducing an idea that can be found in other areas of EU security or EU foreign policy. In a single expression
Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony
Since the end of the Cold War, scholars, commentators, and practitioners of foreign policy have debated what structure of world power would follow the bipolar U.S.-Soviet competition, and what U.S.
The War Ledger
"The War Ledger" provides fresh, sophisticated answers to fundamental questions about major modern wars: Why do major wars begin? What accounts for victory or defeat in war? How do victory and defeat
Advice for a Dark Age: Managing Great Power Competition
  • P. Porter
  • Political Science
    The Washington Quarterly
  • 2019
Whether we like it or not, the world has entered an era of multipolar struggle. A mix of structural pressures and self-fulfilling choices by key players have brought about this dangerous state of
Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power (May 2018)
World leaders, CEOs, and academics have suggested that a revolution in artificial intelligence is upon us. Are they right, and what will advances in artificial intelligence mean for international
Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars
~ Offensive military doctrines threaten international stability.’ World War I vividly illustrates how a crisis can spark a major war that might have been avoided if the major players had had
The Diffusion of Military Power
In Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics, Michael C. Horowitz presents his ‘adoption-capacity theory’ to explain why military technology and doctrine on the
...
1
2
3
4
5
...