The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals

@article{Bratanova2011TheEO,
  title={The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals},
  author={Boyka Bratanova and S. Loughnan and B. Bastian},
  journal={Appetite},
  year={2011},
  volume={57},
  pages={193-196}
}
Most people love animals and love eating meat. One way of reducing this conflict is to deny that animals suffer and have moral rights. We suggest that the act of categorizing an animal as 'food' may diminish their perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn dampens our moral concern. Participants were asked to read about an animal in a distant nation and we manipulated whether the animal was categorized as food, whether it was killed, and human responsibility for its death. The results… Expand
129 Citations

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

The Psychology of Eating Animals
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less
Mind your meat: Religious differences in the social perception of animals.
Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Ambivalence towards meat
Meat
Values and Beliefs of Vegetarians and Omnivores
Not quite human: infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...