The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals

@article{Bratanova2011TheEO,
  title={The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals},
  author={Boyka Bratanova and Steve Loughnan and Brock Bastian},
  journal={Appetite},
  year={2011},
  volume={57},
  pages={193-196}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Psychology of Eating Animals
Most people both eat animals and care about animals. Research has begun to examine the psychological processes that allow people to negotiate this “meat paradox.” To understand the psychology of
The ‘me’ in meat: Does affirming the self make eating animals seem more morally wrong?
“But I Don’t Eat that Much Meat”
As arguments become more pronounced that meat consumption harms the environment, public health, and nonhuman animals, meat-eaters should experience increased pressure to justify their behavior. The
The Moral Divide Between High- and Low-Status Animals: The Role of Human Supremacy Beliefs
ABSTRACT People endorsing stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals typically show less moral concern for animals. Yet, how people think about different types of animals also depends on the
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
TLDR
The role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments is highlighted, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial and reduces negative affect associated with dissonance.
When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less
Why are many Westerners outraged by dog meat, but comfortable with pork? This is particularly puzzling, given strong evidence that both species are highly intelligent. We suggest that although people
The Development of Speciesism: Age-Related Differences in the Moral View of Animals
Humans care for the well-being of some animals (e.g., dogs) yet tacitly endorse the maltreatment of others (e.g., pigs). What treatment is deemed morally appropriate for an animal can depend on
Harnessing Moral Psychology to Reduce Meat Consumption
How can we make moral progress on factory farming? Part of the answer lies in human moral psychology. Meat consumption remains high, despite increased awareness of its negative impact on animal
Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism threat on moral exclusion (vs. inclusion) of animals
Stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals, and stronger perceived threat posed by vegetarianism to traditional practices, are associated with stronger speciesism and more meat consumption
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
TLDR
The role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments is highlighted, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial and reduces negative affect associated with dissonance.
Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into
The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores†
Studies on dehumanization demonstrated that denying certain human characteristics might serve as a strategy for moral disengagement. Meat consumption—especially in the times of cruel animal
Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: the implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status.
TLDR
It is demonstrated that everyday judgments ofmoral status are influenced by perceptions of humanness, and it is shown that distinct human characteristics are linked to specific judgments of moral status.
Ambivalence towards meat
Meat
The essay reflects on the anthropology of everyday life in the socialist system, with particular reference to Poland between 1945 and 1989, using the example of meat – its acquisition, preparation
Values and Beliefs of Vegetarians and Omnivores
TLDR
Compared with the full range of vegetarians and omnivores on right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, human values, and consumption values, the finding suggests that individuals consume meat and embrace its symbolism in ways consistent with their self-definitions.
Not quite human: infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing.
TLDR
It is proposed that infrahumanization may be a strategy for people to reestablish psychological equanimity when confronted with a self-threatening situation and that such a strategy may occur concomitantly with other strategies, such as providing reparations to the out-group.
...
...