Corpus ID: 209502474

The effect of blasting zirconia liner on microtensile bond strength of zirconia to layered and pressed veneers

  title={The effect of blasting zirconia liner on microtensile bond strength of zirconia to layered and pressed veneers},
  author={Noppavan Nagaviroj and Alisa Tapananon and W. Kanchanavasita and Somsak and Chitmongkolsuk},
Objective: To investigate the effect of sandblasting the zirconia liner on the microtensile bond strength of manually-layered and pressed veneers to zirconia Materials and methods: Bilayered zirconia specimens were prepared from e.maxZirCAD framework materials and divided into four groups (at least 30 specimens per group). Two veneering techniques were used: I. Layering technique (e.maxCeram) for group 1 and group 2 and II. Press-on technique (e.maxZirPress) for group 3 and group 4. ZirLiner… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Effect of Surface Treatment and Veneering Method on the Shear Bond Strength between Zirconia and Veneering Ceramics
Purpose: The current study was aimed to assess the effect of various surface treatments: liner, silica coating and laser treatment, and veneering technique on the zirconia veneering ceramic sheerExpand


The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain.
Airborne particle abrasion of the interfacial surface of the Everest® Y-TZP core significantly decreased the MTBS to ZirPress veneering porcelain when compared to no interfacialsurface treatment and cyclic loading did not affect bond strengths in any of the groups, regardless of surface treatment. Expand
Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics.
To prevent delamination and chipping failures of zirconia veneered restorations, careful selection of both framework and veneer ceramic materials, in addition to proper surface treatment, are essential for maintaining good bond strength. Expand
Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics.
Selecting stronger veneer ceramics which have good bond strength with zirconia can reduce the chances of chipping and delamination under function and the liner material should only be used with some layering veneers but not in combination with pressable veneering as it will result in weakening of the microtensile bond strength. Expand
Tensile bond strength between tooth-colored porcelain and sandblasted zirconia framework.
When sandblasted at a pressure of 0.4MPa, the zirconia specimens developed a strong bond with the tooth-colored porcelain, regardless of the type of porcelains, according to the tensile bond strength. Expand
Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
There is significant difference between the bond strength of materials tested, mainly mixed for ceramic groups, and more scientific evidence needed for standardization of bonding protocols. Expand
The effects of thermal mismatch and fabrication procedures on the deflection of layered all-ceramic discs.
The deflection test proved to be a reliable test method for the evaluation of thermal compatibility of porcelains in all-ceramic systems. Expand
Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials.
A range of translucency was identified in the veneered all-ceramic systems tested and may affect their ability to match natural teeth. Expand
Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
  • P. Vigolo, S. Mutinelli
  • Materials Science, Medicine
  • Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
  • 2012
Clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups, and these groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems. Expand
Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
Zirconia offers sufficient stability as a framework material for 3- and 4-unit posterior FPDs and the fit of the frameworks and veneering ceramics, however, should be improved. Expand
Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up.
Zirconia frameworks demonstrated sufficient stability for replacement of posterior teeth, however, the high rates of technical problems should be reduced by further developments of the prototype processing technology. Expand