The dynamics of social learning in an insect model, the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris)

@article{Leadbeater2007TheDO,
  title={The dynamics of social learning in an insect model, the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris)},
  author={Ellouise Leadbeater and Lars Chittka},
  journal={Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology},
  year={2007},
  volume={61},
  pages={1789-1796}
}
Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) are attracted to those particular inflorescences where other bees are already foraging, a process known as local enhancement. Here, we use a quantitative analysis of learning in a foraging task to illustrate that this attraction can lead bees to learn more quickly which flower species are rewarding if they forage in the company of experienced conspecifics. This effect can also be elicited by model bees, rather than live demonstrators. We also show that local… Expand

Figures from this paper

Social transmission of nectar-robbing behaviour in bumble-bees
TLDR
It is shown that nectar robbing by bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris)—an invertebrate behaviour of considerable ecological significance— has the potential to spread through a population at the accelerated rates typical of social transmission. Expand
Bumblebee social learning can lead to suboptimal foraging choices
TLDR
It is found that bumblebees attach particular meaning to conspecific presence on flowers, even when this could lead to suboptimal foraging performance, and the relatively lower flexibility in the use of social than nonsocial cues suggests a biased positive value of Conspecifics as indicators of rewarded flowers. Expand
Social Learning in Bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): Worker Bumblebees Learn to Manipulate and Forage at Artificial Flowers by Observation and Communication within the Colony
TLDR
Bumblebees that saw dead bumblebees in foraging positions, those that watched nest-mates foraging, and those that had only in-hive communication with successful foragers all foraged successfully. Expand
Foraging Bumblebees Selectively Attend to Other Types of Bees Based on Their Reward-Predictive Value
TLDR
It is shown that bumblebees Bombus terrestris learn to attend to specific types of bees based on their learned value as information-providers about reward, indicating that the transmission of social information across species can be highly selective in response to learned value of the information provider, plausibly making the phenomenon adaptive. Expand
Observational Conditioning in Flower Choice Copying by Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): Influence of Observer Distance and Demonstrator Movement
TLDR
Bumblebees possess the capacity to learn the quality of a flower by distal observation of other foragers’ choices, confirming that social learning in bees involves more advanced processes than simple associative learning, and indicates that observational conditioning might be widespread in pollinating insects. Expand
Single bumblebee leaving colony for first time seeks company
TLDR
This work investigates whether bumblebees leaving their colony for the first time are drawn to other live bees, and tests flower-naive workers for their preferences of stimuli presented in a radial maze. Expand
Bumble-bees learn the value of social cues through experience
TLDR
The role of reinforcement in joining behaviour in bumble-bees is investigated and it is shown that such behaviour is promoted through experience when conspecific presence reliably predicts reward. Expand
Foraging bumblebees use social cues more when the task is difficult
TLDR
Foraging bumblebees are able to use social and personal information to optimize foraging decisions in a flexible way and prioritized social over personal information when flower discrimination was difficult and therefore the probability of making errors was higher. Expand
Foraging bumblebees do not rate social information above personal experience
TLDR
There is no evidence that social information is particularly important when personal information fails to produce rewards (a “copy when established behaviour is unproductive” strategy), and bees used social information specifically to complement personal information. Expand
Conspecific and Heterospecific Information Use in Bumblebees
TLDR
The findings demonstrate that social learning is not a unique process limited to conspecifics and that through associative learning, interspecifically sourced information can be just as valuable as that provided by conspecial individuals. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES
Social Wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Foraging Behavior
TLDR
A forager’s ability to learn odors and landmarks, which direct its return to foraging sites, and to associate cues such as odor or leaf damage with resource availability provide the behavioral foundation for facultative specialization by individual foragers. Expand
Conspecifics Enhance Attraction of Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Foragers to Food Baits
TLDR
The results show that the combination of meat and wasps strongly enhances the attraction of conspecific foragers, and presenting both visual and olfactory cues together leads to a wasp response that is much greater than if isolated visual or isolated o aroma cues were added, suggesting some synergistic action of both cues. Expand
Chance and adaptation in the evolution of island bumblebee behaviour
TLDR
Genetic drift, exaptation, and pleiotropy are considered as possible alternative explanations to a strictly adaptive explanation for between population behavioural differences in bumblebees. Expand
Social Learning in Noncolonial Insects?
TLDR
It is shown that crickets adapt their predator-avoidance behavior after having observed the behavior of knowledgeable others and maintain these behavioral changes lastingly after demonstrators are gone, pointing toward social learning, a contingency never shown before in noncolonial insects. Expand
The use of field–based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees
TLDR
This study showed that in addition to such an information‐centre strategy, social information in the field also plays an important role in individual foraging decisions in six species of stingless bee. Expand
Do bumble bees save time when choosing novel flowers by following conspecifics
TLDR
The results suggest that the presence of conspecifics on flowers has stronger effects on bees’ decision-making as the attractiveness of flowers increases, and that bees use both visual and non-visual cues to recognize conspecies on flowers. Expand
Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees
TLDR
The systematic foraging behavior of B. vagans workers foraging from Aconitum napellus inflorescences may be a mechanism of reducing the revisiting of just-emptied flowers. Expand
Influence of Conspecific Attraction on the Spatial Distribution of Learning Foragers in a Patchy Habitat.
TLDR
Simulations of a population with ESS levels of attraction found that conspecific attraction can have important, and often disruptive effects on spatial distributions, and predictions of the model in habitats where patches deplete slowly are supported by several studies. Expand
Laboratory analysis of flower constancy in foraging bumblebees: Bombus ternarius and B. terricola
TLDR
The laboratory experiments suggest that bumblebees, once conditioned, are relatively ‘constant’ foragers despite changes in resource availability. Expand
Flower choice copying in bumblebees
TLDR
It is demonstrated that bumblebees can change flower choice by observations of non-nest mates, a novel form of social learning in insects that could provide unique benefits to the colony. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...