The duality of knowledge

Abstract

Knowledge Management (KM) is a field that has attracted much attention both in academic and practitioner circles. Most KM projects appear to be primarily concerned with knowledge that can be quantified and can be captured, codified and stored an approach more deserving of the label Information Management. Recently there has been recognition that some knowledge cannot be quantified and cannot be captured, codified or stored. However, the predominant approach to the management of this knowledge remains to try to convert it to a form that can be handled using the 'traditional' approach. In this paper, we argue that this approach is flawed and some knowledge simply cannot be captured. A method is needed which recognises that knowledge resides in people: not in machines or documents. We will argue that KM is essentially about people and the earlier technology driven approaches, which failed to consider this, were bound to be limited in their success. One possible way forward is offered by Communities of Practice, which provide an environment for people to develop knowledge through interaction with others in an environment where knowledge is created nurtured and sustained.

Extracted Key Phrases

5 Figures and Tables

Statistics

01020'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

120 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 120 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Hildreth2002TheDO, title={The duality of knowledge}, author={Paul Hildreth and Chris Kimble}, journal={Inf. Res.}, year={2002}, volume={8} }