The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.

@article{Gifford2011TheDO,
  title={The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.},
  author={Robert Gifford},
  journal={The American psychologist},
  year={2011},
  volume={66 4},
  pages={
          290-302
        }
}
  • R. Gifford
  • Published 1 May 2011
  • Psychology
  • The American psychologist
Most people think climate change and sustainability are important problems, but too few global citizens engaged in high-greenhouse-gas-emitting behavior are engaged in enough mitigating behavior to stem the increasing flow of greenhouse gases and other environmental problems. Why is that? Structural barriers such as a climate-averse infrastructure are part of the answer, but psychological barriers also impede behavioral choices that would facilitate mitigation, adaptation, and environmental… 

Tables from this paper

The Perils of Explaining Climate Inaction in Terms of Psychological Barriers

As awareness of climate change and its consequences increases, many have asked, “Why aren’t people taking action?” Some psychologists have provided an answer that we describe as a “psychological

Climate Psychology: What is preventing the uptake in lifestyle changes that would significantly reduce one’s environmental impact?

Human consumption and human emissions are rapidly destroying our home planet and the vital ingredients of life—the science is clear and abundant. And so, we need to make extreme changes in many

Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change

A frequent suggestion to increase individuals' willingness to take action on climate change and to support relevant policies is to highlight its proximal consequences, that is, those that are close

Challenging the Idea That Humans Are Not Designed to Solve Climate Change

  • Q. AtkinsonJennifer Jacquet
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2021
TLDR
Four key problems are identified with attributing climate inaction to "human nature" or evolved psychological barriers: it minimizes variability within and between populations; it oversimplifies psychological research and its implications for policy; it frames responsibility for climate change in terms of the individual at the expense of other aspects of culture; and it rationalizes inaction.

Wrinkles in Time and Drops in the Bucket: Circumventing Temporal and Social Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior

Human engagement in pro-environmental action is necessary for mitigating the effects of climate change. However, psychological barriers, such as feeling that the problem is distant in time and that

Public Communication as a Tool to Implement Environmental Policies

  • G. Vries
  • Business
    Social Issues and Policy Review
  • 2019
Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our times. We humans must change our behavior in the short run to mitigate the effects of climate change in the long run. Policymakers develop

Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions

This overview describes the anthropogenic drivers of global climate change, reviews the behavioral and psychological responses to its impacts (including barriers to behavior change), considers

Escaping the Climate Trap: Participation in a Climate-Specific Social Dilemma Simulation Boosts Climate-Protective Motivation and Actions

One way in which educators can help to address increasingly pressing environmental problems, including climate change, is to encourage individuals to change their behavior and to press for structural

Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change

TLDR
It is argued that policymakers should emphasize climate change as a present, local, and personal risk; facilitate more affective and experiential engagement; leverage relevant social group norms; and frame policy solutions in terms of what can be gained from immediate action.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 189 REFERENCES

Who Wants to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Objective. We examine cognitive, economic, and partisan heuristic theories of why some people express support for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Methods. Data come from a mail survey of 623

In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?

In a survey of 1,218 Americans, the key determinant of behavioral intentions to address global warming is a correct understanding of the causes of global warming. Knowing what causes climate change,

Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

Numerous theoretical frameworks have been developed to explain the gap between the possession of environmental knowledge and environmental awareness, and displaying pro-environmental behavior.

Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

Abstract  We investigated preferences for climate change mitigation policies and factors contributing to higher levels of policy support. The sample was comprised of 316 Michigan and Virginia

Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change

The research reported here examines the relationship between risk perceptions and willingness to address climate change. The data are a national sample of 1225 mail surveys that include measures of

Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation

The effects of support for free-market ideology and environmental apathy were investigated to identify some bases for not believing in global climate change. A survey of community residents' (N= 185)

Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts

System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change”

TLDR
The present research finds that it is possible to eliminate the negative effect of system justification on environmentalism by encouraging people to regard pro-environmental change as patriotic and consistent with protecting the status quo (i.e., as a case of “system-sanctioned change”).

The Emergency of Climate Change: Why Are We Failing to Take Action?

Latane and Darley developed a five-stage model to understand why people do and do not help other people in emergency situations. We extend their five-stage model to explore why people do and do not

Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy

Crises in obesity and changes in the environment illustrate the need to change problematic behaviors and lifestyles in large segments of the population. This article uses social psychological theory
...