The dog that didn ’ t bark : Would increased electoral turnout make a difference ?

@inproceedings{PettersenTheDT,
  title={The dog that didn ’ t bark : Would increased electoral turnout make a difference ?},
  author={Per Arnt Pettersen and Lawrence E. Rose}
}
  • Per Arnt Pettersen, Lawrence E. Rose
The question of whether increased electoral turnout would make a difference has long been a matter of interest to psephologists and laymen alike. Several approaches to this question have been employed, one of which has been an analysis of responses to survey questions about how non-voters would have voted had they actually voted. The problem with this approach is not only that it involves responses to a hypothetical question, but also that the responses are given after the election outcome is… CONTINUE READING

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections

  • P. R. Abramson, J. H. Aldrich, D. W. Rohde
  • 2002
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Introduction: consequences of low turnout

  • G. Lutz, M. Marsh
  • Electoral Studies
  • 2007
1 Excerpt

Velgerne i villrede.: en analyse av stortingsvalget

  • B. Aardal
  • 2003
1 Excerpt

Den stadig synkende deltakelsen ved lokale valg e noen årsaker og konsekvenser

  • T. Bjørklund
  • Valgdeltakelse og lokaldemokrati. Kommuneforlaget…
  • 2001
1 Excerpt

The political implication of higher turnout

  • B. Highton, R. E. Wolfinger
  • British Journal of Political Science
  • 2001
1 Excerpt

Scandinavian Politics Today

  • D. Arter
  • 1999
1 Excerpt

Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma

  • A. Lijphart
  • American Political Science Review 91,
  • 1997
3 Excerpts

The 1994 EU referendum in Norway : continuity and change

  • K. L. Schlozman, P. A. Pettersen, A. T. Jenssen, O. Listhaug
  • Scandinavian Political Studies
  • 1996

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…