The discourse of anarchy in IR

@article{Donnelly2015TheDO,
  title={The discourse of anarchy in IR},
  author={Jack Donnelly},
  journal={International Theory},
  year={2015},
  volume={7},
  pages={393 - 425}
}
  • J. Donnelly
  • Published 21 September 2015
  • Political Science
  • International Theory
Contemporary International Relations (IR) typically treats anarchy as a fundamental, defining, and analytically central feature of international relations. Furthermore, it is usually held that IR since its inception has been structured around a discourse of anarchy. In fact, however, until the 1980s anarchy was rarely employed as a central analytical concept, as I show by examining 145 books published between 1895 and 1978. The conceptual and analytic centrality of anarchy is not imposed on us… 
Why anarchy still matters for International Relations: On theories and things
The category of anarchy is conventionally associated with the emergence of an autonomous discipline of International Relations (IR). Recently, Donnelly has argued that anarchy has never been central
On the shores of anarchy : Jacques Rancière in International Relations
In this thesis I argue for the articulation of the work of Jacques Ranciere to International Relations (IR) theory. In response to the fourth “debate” I show, using Ranciere that ‘anarchy’ is the
Anarchy and International Relations theory: A reconsideration
In this introduction to the Special Issue, we undertake a little ground clearing in order to make room in International Relations for thinking differently about anarchy and world politics. Anarchy’s
Reconstructing hierarchy as the key international relations concept and its implications for the study of Japanese national identity
Abstract For the last few decades, the discipline of international relations has been littered with anarchy. Since Waltz's Theory of International Politics, it has been assumed that states are
David Mitrany on the international anarchy. A lost work of classical realism?
Although David Mitrany’s international thought is not usually associated with the concept of the international anarchy, I argue that his analysis actually compares two forms of anarchical order. The
Spectra of Sovereignty: Nationalism and International Relations
This article furthers our understanding of the ontology of modern international relations by foregrounding the neglected structuring role of nationalism. Most accounts of nationalism in
Anarchy, ordering principles and the constitutive regime of the international system
  • M. Helal
  • Political Science
    Global Constitutionalism
  • 2019
Abstract: Anarchy is the conceptual cornerstone of international relations theory and international law scholarship. Anarchy is described as the ordering principle of the international system, it is
Beyond anarchy: logics of political organization, hierarchy, and international structure
Many scholars now argue for deemphasizing the importance of international anarchy in favor of focusing on hierarchy – patterns of super- and subordination – in world politics. We argue that only one
Hierarchies in World Politics
Abstract Hierarchy-centered approaches to IR promise to deliver what anarchy-centered approaches have not: a framework for theorizing and empirically analyzing world politics as a global system
Terminological Entrepreneurs and Discursive Shifts in International Relations: How a Discipline Invented the “International Regime”
The disciplinary history of international relations (IR) is usually told as a succession of theories or “isms” that are connected to academic schools. Echoing the increasing criticism of this
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 366 REFERENCES
The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: a critique *
‘ Anarchy is one of the most vague and ambiguous words in language.’ George Coreewall Lewis, 1832. In much current theorizing, anarchy has once again been declared to be the fundamental assumption
The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations
The prevailing view concerning the development of theory in international relations is that the fleld is beset by a bewildering variety of theoretical approaches, models, and concepts-that it is "in
Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society
How is unrivalled American power reshaping 21st-century international society? Is the United States an empire, in fact or in the making? This article attempts to elaborate the conceptual resources
The Elements of the Structures of International Systems
  • J. Donnelly
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 2012
Abstract Structural international theory has become largely a matter of elaborating “the effects of anarchy.” Simple hunter-gatherer band societies, however, perfectly fit the Waltzian model of
Anarchy, egoism, and third images: The Evolution of Cooperation and international relations
  • Joanne Gowa
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 1986
The Evolution of Cooperation is not a timid book. Its objective is ambitious; its approach bold; its scope broad. It addresses an issue of central importance to scholars, political leaders, and
The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models
The balance of power has been a central concept in the theory and practice of international relations for the past five hundred years. It has also played a key role in some of the most important
Rereading Early Twentieth‐Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited
The article presents a “revisionist” synopsis of the thinking of some important early twentieth-century “Idealist” IR writers. I contend that these writers ground their interpretations of
The New Sovereignty in International Relations1
The academic study of sovereignty is undergoing a mini-renaissance. Stimulated by criticisms of classical conceptions of sovereignty in systemic theories of politics, scholars returned to sovereignty
Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate
  • R. Powell
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 1994
Two of the most influential contemporary approaches to international relations theory are neorealism and neoliberalism. The debate between these two approaches has dominated much of international
Realism as tragedy
  • B. Schmidt
  • Political Science
    Review of International Studies
  • 2004
In 1948, Hans J. Morgenthau wrote his classic text, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, that was largely responsible for establishing realism as the prevailing theory in the
...
...